Indy, never makes snide remarks without responding? - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

Archaea · 04-23-2007, 05:44 PM

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639883

In response to a simple unrelated question, Indy gets his jabs in against SIEQ.

YOhio · 04-23-2007, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archaea

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639883

In response to a simple unrelated question, Indy gets his jabs in against SIEQ.

And this one:

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639878

Indy Coug · 04-23-2007, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YOhio

And this one:

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639878

That was an insult to SEIQ? I was making a joke about the food option, not SEIQ.

SeattleUte · 04-23-2007, 05:51 PM

I wonder which GA Indy is.

Indy Coug · 04-23-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archaea

http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639883

In response to a simple unrelated question, Indy gets his jabs in against SIEQ.

I think I explained my answer as the thread developed. I place more value in the message than the messenger.

Indy Coug · 04-23-2007, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

I wonder which GA Indy is.

I didn't go to graduate school.

YOhio · 04-23-2007, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

That was an insult to SEIQ? I was making a joke about the food option, not SEIQ.

No you weren't. You were making fun of his horrible breath.

Archaea · 04-23-2007, 05:52 PM

Indy is a spreadsheet master, but he is also a shoot and run, internet terroist.

It would be great for him to espouse something fun, and to remain to defend it.

It is good to have the fundamentalists among us, and Indy is well-researched, good enough to debunk us in our false securities.

SIEQ is not somebody who is thoughtless (he'd be correct if he leveled againsst me), but SIEQ usually has given a topic one hundred times more actual thought than most.

So that's the challenge, to see if Indy can post a well-thought out, cutting edge perspective and whether he'll stay around to defend it in the varnacular of the transaction.

Indy Coug · 04-23-2007, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YOhio

No you weren't. You were making fun of his horrible breath.

How would I know what his breath is like? If you really think that was an attempt to insult SEIQ, then your tin foil hat is about 3 sizes too small.

SeattleUte · 04-23-2007, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

I didn't go to graduate school.

I think Indy is on an Internet mission. He's been called, ordained, etc. to bring the pure doctrine to Internet geeks. That's his job right now.

04-23-2007, 05:44 PM	#1
Archaea Assistant to the Regional Manager Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: The Orgasmatron Posts: 24,338	Indy, never makes snide remarks without responding? http://www.cougarboard.com/noframes/...tml?id=2639883 In response to a simple unrelated question, Indy gets his jabs in against SIEQ. __________________ Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

04-23-2007, 05:51 PM	#4
SeattleUte fairlds.org Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 10,665	I wonder which GA Indy is. __________________ Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster

04-23-2007, 05:52 PM	#8
Archaea Assistant to the Regional Manager Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: The Orgasmatron Posts: 24,338	Indy is a spreadsheet master, but he is also a shoot and run, internet terroist. It would be great for him to espouse something fun, and to remain to defend it. It is good to have the fundamentalists among us, and Indy is well-researched, good enough to debunk us in our false securities. SIEQ is not somebody who is thoughtless (he'd be correct if he leveled againsst me), but SIEQ usually has given a topic one hundred times more actual thought than most. So that's the challenge, to see if Indy can post a well-thought out, cutting edge perspective and whether he'll stay around to defend it in the varnacular of the transaction. __________________ Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα