![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
![]() |
![]()
The SLC market would tend to say hmm, I don't know.
However, if they realized that BYU has majority interest in SLC, a good minority interest in Phoenix, Las Vegas and even Denver, might that be sold as something in favor? BYU has done okay on a spartan budget.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
![]() |
![]()
BYU is by far the most compelling addition to a BCS conference in terms of $. Moreso than Utah.
But that doesn't mean they meet the economic threshold of inclusion. Big 12 doesn't have a big incentive to expand right now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 217
![]() |
![]()
The only merit that matters for being included in a BCS conference is money. As fans of a school from a non AQ conference we get caught up on how good a team is and on shooting for AQ status. The Big 12 already has AQ status and is not in danger of losing it any time soon.
That is why I continue to hold to the idea that when the Big 12 expands, they will go east--greater population and media coverage. I know the Memphis fan base is begging for inclusion in the Big 12. Northern Illinois with its Chicago market might stand a better chance than BYU to get a Big 12 invite. If the Pac 10 wasn't so geographically limited, Utah would never have been invited. I would love to see BYU in the Big 12, but after what happened this year, I am afraid the business side will keep BYU out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|