05-16-2007, 07:38 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Is all history mythology?
"History" is as organic and everchanging as the present. Yes, more evidence of what happened once upon a time is always being discovered in our enlightened times. More significant, however, is the phenomenon that we constantly regard and re-evaluate history with our contemporary eyes, which are by definition ever changing with the benefit of experience including but not limited to the discovery of new evidence. Each generation must venerate and create its own take on history. (Arthur Schlessinger, Jr. has written eloquently about this phenomenon.) Moreover, "histories" from antiquity or late antiquity or the Middle Ages were composed sometimes decades or centuries after the events in question. Particularly in the Middle Ages there was not placement of a high intrinsic value on empirical truth that characterizes our modern times. Thus, there is much reason to be skeptical about histories written before the printing press.
Nevertheless, I have read here from time to time an assertion that all "history" is just mythology by a different name in any event, that is just wrong. The motivation for this is easy to see, and the assertion is just plain nonsense and even harmful. At best it's a poor rationalization for the inadequacies of scripture as history or the patently false information in canonized works. (Those of us who do not regard the Bible as "history," but as the best available written evidence of the comings and goings of certain ancient peoples on a macro level that must always be cross-referenced with physical evidence, feel no compulsion to rationalize while greatly valuing the Bible on its own merits, including as a great literary work.) At worst this assertion creates a lack of respect for or rigor in truth seeking, and even tolerance for patent falsehood.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 05-16-2007 at 07:46 PM. |
05-16-2007, 07:55 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
|
|
05-16-2007, 08:00 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Happy Valley, PA
Posts: 1,866
|
Quote:
Please correct me if I've misread your intent, but I think you take issue (as do I) with those who discredit all modern, honest historical inquiry by applying postmodernist "we can't know anything for sure" rhetoric. That approach is so 90s. As long as people keep trying to shove history into religion and religion into history, I'm going to be grumpy. The history of religion is something I'm comfortable with. The religion of history is not.
__________________
I hope for nothing. I fear nothing. I am free. - Epitaph of Nikos Kazantzakis (1883-1957) |
|
05-16-2007, 08:06 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
What makes me grumpy is when people try to deny any historicity whatsoever from scripture, essentially rendering scripture as pure allegory.
Just because the history is often incomplete or inaccurate, it shouldn't exclude the possibility that the events even in their most general terms actually occurred. |
05-16-2007, 08:08 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
Humans' impetus to create myth and the value of myth to humans may be the most facinating subject to study ever (in my opinion). You have identified some purposes of mythology. I would not limit it to that; some may be difficult to articulate or even identify. The need for myth seems to be in our very DNA (Waters has said the same thing about religion; we're probably talking about the same thing at the end of the day).
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 05-16-2007 at 08:17 PM. |
|
05-16-2007, 08:12 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Happy Valley, PA
Posts: 1,866
|
Quote:
__________________
I hope for nothing. I fear nothing. I am free. - Epitaph of Nikos Kazantzakis (1883-1957) |
|
05-16-2007, 08:13 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
I do, however, dismiss the Book of Mormon or the Book of Abraham as utterly devoid of historical content.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
05-16-2007, 08:15 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
|
05-16-2007, 08:15 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
05-16-2007, 08:17 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
By the way, I think Freud may have nailed it. Just my opinion.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
Bookmarks |
|
|