04-23-2008, 02:26 PM | #1 | ||||||
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Due process concerns for the FLDS situation
1. The standard that the judge had to use to make a decision was whether a child 1) had been abused or 2) was in imminent danger of abuse.
This was what the ACLU said as reported by Catholic News: Quote:
2. The lack of hearings for each child to consider that child's unique circumstances. There are reports that some children were visiting and had been there for only a few days. Again from the ACLU: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
From the DN: Quote:
5. Lastly, this is not a legal argument, but an argument that the judge has admitted, I think, to being incompetent and unable to handle the case: Quote:
|
||||||
04-23-2008, 02:29 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
The same people who laud this judge for cracking down on the FLDS pedophiles probably defend to the hilt pedophiles who are let go all around this country by liberal judges. |
|
04-23-2008, 03:03 PM | #3 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
04-23-2008, 03:11 PM | #4 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Texas justice, a six shooter and asking questions of the deceased.
That hearing was a joke, and hello 1983 actions galore. I wish I would receive some of those fees to be earned. That is an example of the worst of American justice, although there are some beauts now and then.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
04-23-2008, 03:19 PM | #5 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Please do not come here and say "due process wasn't possible."
You sound like a moron. And I'm serious. |
04-23-2008, 03:24 PM | #6 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
First, small counties typically can rely upon visiting or senior judges. You call them up immediately. Second, you postpone all other matters, and schedule around the clock. Third, you summarily review cases that appear non-legitimate, i.e., the infants and dismiss those providing CPS the opportunity to bolster their cases, ordering the defendants or mothers not to leave town. Fourth, you deny the class action custody hearing, as that is NOT constitutionally allowed, as far as my limited knowledge of custody hearings go. Fifth, you set schedules via internet, require filings to occur timely, especially by CPS or dismiss the contention. It would take about two weeks to a month, but perhaps one could pare it down. This judge is a joke.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
04-23-2008, 03:30 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
|
04-23-2008, 03:33 PM | #8 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
04-23-2008, 03:34 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
|
04-23-2008, 03:47 PM | #10 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Apparently, you have judges in Texas who betray your state.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
Bookmarks |
|
|