12-01-2006, 07:10 PM | #25 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
That naive approach is simply cart before apple, which is my objection to Bush's approach. You don't give democracy to people wanting stability, economic success and who are not educated. You must also engage in a costs benefit approach in light of very limited dollars. An approach of curing the world's ills does not create stability as there is not enough money anywhere to solve ills. For a society to become stable, it needs these things created internally, not externally. First, economic viability, economic freedom and resources or skills which one can market. Without that, that society can never succeed. Second, it needs to have a reason to exist. Many of the world's nations have been forced together unnaturally by colonial powers. Artificial nations are less likely to last. Third, the internal structure of governance must mature as the people become more educated. Fourth, the society must protect itself from outside predators. It is naive, costly and will not ever succeed to think we can solve any or most of Africa's problems. It is a collection of feudal nations, a greatly illiterate populace, with badly allocated resources, and horrible governments. The naive police advocated since Carter will simply send our nation reeling sooner than natural causes will incur it. We cannot impose civility in the Sudan, Somalia or any where else for that matter. Until the internal population consent to be governed, no amount of police force can succeed. Until the people consent to governing themselves intelligently, no amount of AIDS expenditures will succeed. I doubt many of those cultures will survive, as they lack the internal characteristics for them to survive.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|