05-29-2007, 07:16 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Epoch changing significance of "Mormon Doctrine"
The generation that raised me used to believe in something like the infallibility of General Authorities. This was a useful belief, employed, inter alia, as fall back to explain (superficially) the inexplicable re many once closet-bound skeletons. Since "Mormon Doctrine" pragmatic Mormons must acknowledge that their apostles and prophets are very capable of not only error, but downright foolishness, backwardness, mendacity, and purveying downright evil and false creed. There is no other explanation for "Mormon Doctrine" regardless of your status with the Mormon church, if you have more than an ounce of pragmatism. "Mormon Doctrine" is an embarrassment of staggering proportions. It just is. This is ironic considering how revered McConkie was by the generation that raised me.
I note that "Mormon Doctrine" was McConkie's work but he was a senior apostle and the title and tone of this work are nothing if not authoritative sounding, and no one stood up to denounce it. No one who counts has still ever stood up to denounce it. I've never gotten used to the condescending and critical comments younger Mormons now routinely apply to McConkie, as a superficial fall back to explaining the inexplicable, though it appears some younger Mormons take this reality for granted. To me this paradigm shift is astonishing.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 05-29-2007 at 07:18 PM. |
05-29-2007, 07:21 PM | #2 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
05-29-2007, 07:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
If I remember correctly, the book was published years before he was called as the quorum's junior-most apostle.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
05-29-2007, 07:28 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
See what I mean? The strategy now is always to attack McConkie, kill the messenger. He and his reputation and credentials must be attacked for the greater good.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
05-29-2007, 07:31 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
The calculus on a seventy publishing a book with inaccuracies is quite different from that of a senior apostle doing the same.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
05-29-2007, 07:38 PM | #6 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
He was merely a Seventy who happened to marry a high ranking leader's daughter.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
05-29-2007, 07:41 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
I'm going to have to agree with SU's general point. I don't a agree with the infallibility talk or his other specifics, but Mormon Doctrine is a hugely unfluential book. Did you guys see the BYU studies article a few years ago? "Which Are the Most Important Mormon Books?" In the survey, Mormon Doctrine is #2 in the Doctrinal books category. The survey is of primarily BYU religion and CES teachers so it is going to skew conservative, but I don't think more conservative than the average member.
And this article is from 2002, not 1982. See: http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/do...PTR=4292&REC=1 |
05-29-2007, 07:42 PM | #8 |
Charon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the heart of darkness (Provo)
Posts: 9,564
|
I am struggling to understand what his general point is. Perhaps you can help me.
__________________
"... the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice." Martin Luther King, Jr. |
05-29-2007, 07:45 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
I thought it was that Mormon Doctrine was a very important book and people in the church thought very highly of it before SU left. It was close to the standard reference work on doctrine. Did I incorrectly see through SU's hyperbole?
|
05-29-2007, 07:45 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
He was a member of the 12 for 13 years. I wasn't aware that there was such a formal status as "senior apostle." MD was in publication all that time. I believe he was one of the oldest and longest tenured apostles when he died.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
Bookmarks |
|
|