|
02-25-2008, 03:10 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
It will be interesting to see how Hawaii does from here on out. BSU had a nice run, we'll see how the next couple of years go. Utes, well you decide. Now BCS teams don't always stay on top either, but when they fall they are still BCS teams. If our future is based on playing 10 non-BCS teams a year, the odds are very good we are going to be playing mainly mediocre teams. The product, on field games and games for TV are going to be mainly mediocre. |
|
02-25-2008, 09:32 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,384
|
Quote:
BCS programs play 8 BCS games a year and BYU thinks they have a tough schedule with only 2. |
|
02-25-2008, 03:09 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
Incidentally, I think Bronco's words are largely misunderstood. I really don't think he meant he wants to see a lot of pansies on the schedule. I think he wants to play 2-3 decent-to-good BCS teams a year, plus a cakewalk, and with maybe a ranked BCS team thrown in occasionally. Many of the comments he's made, IMO, were more about commiserating with the crappy situation CFB is currently in with the BCS than about what he actually wants to have happen... |
|
02-25-2008, 03:14 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
Well I am more encouraged by Holmoe speak than Bronco speak. Since I am not a great interpreter, I will just have to go on what Bronco said and hope he doesn't mean it literally. Maybe I am wrong, but I think the scheduling of BSU for 4 years is not in addition to two BCS teams, but as a replacement for a BCS team. I would love to see BSU on the schedule plus two BCS teams, that would certainly help me to feel better about what the future scheduling philosophy is. The price on those tickets would be full price. It makes my point. People just aren't that interested in at least half of the home games coming up next year. |
|
02-25-2008, 03:04 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Well, you can count me as one of those "4,000" new DTV subscribers. Oh, my brother as well, he's said he's planning on switching to DTV this summer.
Numbers from call centers can be skewed in so many different ways, you should ALWAYS take them with a grain of salt. I never personally called DTV or Dish. And yet, I'll be switching. I don't believe my brother ever personally called DTV or Dish. And yet, he'll be switching. Are we atypical BYU fans? Sure...we both frequent message boards, which is typical of a more 'devoted' follower. Still, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see DTV subscriptions rise in MWC markets by far more than "4,000" subscriptions. |
02-25-2008, 03:42 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2008, 03:54 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
Of the 100,000 people 'interested' in a certain channel (the number pulled from where the sun don't shine, for use in this argument), what percentage actually make the call to tell you how they feel? Let's just assume it's 10% (which is probably an overestimation, IMO). Now, how many of that 10% are able to find the RIGHT number to call, and then actually get through to the right location where they can give their information? Then, you're relying on the person taking the data (I'll leave it to you to determine how often a 'mistake' is made in this case) to do so correctly. Lastly, factor in the fact that MANY potential customers have given up by this point (persistence is NOT most American's strong suit), and I think you'll find far more subscriptions brought about by the Mtn than were indicated by the number of requests. That is what I meant by 'grain of salt'. |
|
02-25-2008, 04:06 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
One thing I think would be interesting, and I would have asked for it yesterday if my friend wasn't trying to finish his weekly reports, is the last 18 months worth of data. I know for a fact that Dish and DTV got slammed with calls for about 2 hour period in August of 2006. I happened to unleash about 200 outbound agents on them when one of our dialers went down. Removing those calls, I would be interested to see what six month period had the most volume. My guess is that it's not much different today than it was 18 months ago. I do agree with you that some who are currently Dish customers will switch. I don't think it's going to be significant. I would guess most lived through two years, they'll not go through the hassle believing that Dish is going to be on board soon also or flat out don't know DTV has it. I think DTV will get back most if not all their customers they lost from Comcast. I think DTV knows this and that is why they publicly welcomed Dish to get involved in the distribution. It won't hurt them at all and it might hurt Comcast. That's just my reading into things though. |
|
02-25-2008, 04:12 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,368
|
The data isn't worthless. Although there may be some errors in the collection, that isn't the real problem with using it to guess what those who didn't bother to call are thinking. It's that there is no way to know for sure if it accurately represents what's out there because it's not a random sampling of the audience. Self-selectors are often not representative of those who don't call. All you know is what that group thinks. There is also no way of knowing how many people care about the channel and didn't call. The only way to get a good reading on that would be to design a study using a random or as close to random sampling of the audience you can get, and ask them about the mtn. But that's really expensive and not worth the trouble, so they don't do it.
|
02-25-2008, 04:21 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
IMO, it'd be far more cost-effective in driving marketing policy. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|