Ok, I am open to some constructive

[exUte]

Originally Posted by BYU71

criticism here. You all pretty much know I am a CC Legacy member.

Mentioning that or where I sit seems to set some people off. Saying that seems to indicate I am announcing I am better than they are or rich or some other kind of bullshit, my opinion.

What I am trying to express is perhaps the feeling of people who are Legacy members. While they are not better people, let's face facts, those who contribute have more influence in our society. They aren't better people, but they do have more influence. It also doesn't mean they are rich, it could have been my very last $10,000 to my name and the kids aren't going to get anything.

I was trying to give a perspective that I know 3 Legacy members who aren't buying tickets this year and their reasons why. I happen to buy my allotment as a request from CB members. I am out now $1850, I hope I get the money.

Is their no value in expressing how some Legacy members feel and it is always just seen as a chance to express one is better and richer than others.

I know plenty of people who have more money than brains.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by exUte

I know plenty of people who have more money than brains.

You can't give us EWU every year and have fans be happy.

What administration forgets, is UCLA gets USC, Arizona, Cal and other good teams every year on the schedule. So if they have one snoozer, no big deal.

Most of our conference schedule is boring. We can't add boring nonconference as well.

[exUte]

Originally Posted by Archaea

You can't give us EWU every year and have fans be happy.

What administration forgets, is UCLA gets USC, Arizona, Cal and other good teams every year on the schedule. So if they have one snoozer, no big deal.

Most of our conference schedule is boring. We can't add boring nonconference as well.

it's a crappy conference and there are typically only 1 or 2 games a year worth paying money for. Unfortuantely the two games are both either away or at home. This year they are away. The problem is if you give up your tickets you lose those seats should you decide to return the year after.

[il Padrino Ute]

Originally Posted by exUte

The problem is if you give up your tickets you lose those seats should you decide to return the year after.

So, you believe that BYU should kiss your ass and let you buy the same seats whenever you decide to by tickets?

[exUte]

Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute

So, you believe that BYU should kiss your ass and let you buy the same seats whenever you decide to by tickets?

Or was I simply stating the case that if you let your season tickets lapse (kind of like your brain), you won't get them back.

Did you ever take this course?: http://hum.utah.edu/philosophy/faculty/newman/

Philosophy 3200

[il Padrino Ute]

Ok, so I took your post out of context to make you look like a dickhead. I guess I don't need to point it out, as everyone already knows you are a dickhead.

Notice in your original quote you whine about only lousy games being at home and the only decent games being on the road. From that, I mistakenly thought you were griping that BYU didn't bow don to you and give you what you want. I guess the communication breakdown was on your part, because if people don't understand what you're saying, it's your fault.

Originally Posted by exUte

it's a crappy conference and there are typically only 1 or 2 games a year worth paying money for. Unfortuantely the two games are both either away or at home. This year they are away. The problem is if you give up your tickets you lose those seats should you decide to return the year after.

[exUte]

Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute

Ok, so I took your post out of context to make you look like a dickhead. I guess I don't need to point it out, as everyone already knows you are a dickhead.

Notice in your original quote you whine about only lousy games being at home and the only decent games being on the road. From that, I mistakenly thought you were griping that BYU didn't bow don to you and give you what you want. I guess the communication breakdown was on your part, because if people don't understand what you're saying, it's your fault.

home schedule is good in 2008 and that it's better than their conference road schedule?

BTW...........you seem to be overly infatuated with two parts of yours and other peoples bodies. Can we expect to see you on MSNBC Reports? LOL

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by exUte

home schedule is good in 2008 and that it's better than their conference road schedule?

BTW...........you seem to be overly infatuated with two parts of yours and other peoples bodies. Can we expect to see you on MSNBC Reports? LOL

What is the deal with you two? And why do so many people openly profess disdain for you?

I honestly don't know the backstory here, but it seems like you are the new pack-hunted Lingo.

[exUte]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

What is the deal with you two? And why do so many people openly profess disdain for you?

I honestly don't know the backstory here, but it seems like you are the new pack-hunted Lingo.

see where the discussion got side tracked. Because of exute? LOL

In IPU's own words: "Ok, so I took your post out of context to make you look like a dickhead. I guess I don't need to point it out, as everyone already knows you are a dickhead."

So who took what post out of context and then proceeded his diatribe, not about the topic but about the poster? I'll hang up and listen to your answer.

Read the media post re: Tebow. Where did the thread get sidetracked? Because of exute? LOL

It would really serve you well to read these posts in context.

[BYU71]

Originally Posted by exUte

I know plenty of people who have more money than brains.

I know. It has to be very frustrating for all those smart people to see dummer people with more money.