02-22-2008, 01:32 PM | #201 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
There is no such thing as an objective source in politics (which almost by definition is opinion). Getting the candidate's ideas from the horse's mouth is a good and fair idea, but you'll get his spin just as much as anyone else's. We have more options available to us to BE informed than any group of people in any era of the world. TV, radio, blogs, etc. ought to be praised, not criticized. What options did people have in 1980 to be informed about Ronald Reagan's policies? In 1960 about JFK's? The system isn't perfect. I watch "Jaywalking" like everyone else and know there's a bunch of willful ignoramuses out there who don't know and don't care (of which many seem to have drifted to the Obama campaign). But if you want to hear opinions, from BOTH sides, all you have to do is turn it on, or log on. It's that simple. That's a good thing.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
02-22-2008, 01:59 PM | #202 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
It is a chicken-egg issue. Did the candidates first boil their policies down to 15 second sound bytes, or did the news cycles start cutting out everything except 15 second sound bytes and the candidates then catered to the news organizations? It doesn't really matter who did what first, in the end, because we are stuck with the simple fact that there isn't much discussion on issues in the media. The issues are oversimplified and discussed only if there is a big scary graphic pertaining to the issue. This is true of all MSM. With the blogs, they are even more overtly partisan than the MSM in most cases. The blogs are where you can go to get the spin on an event involving your preferred candidate. The place where you will find the most detailed information on a candidate's positions will be in that candidate's white papers (which are almost always on that person's website). Of course it will have spin. Are you going to tell me you have found some great source of information that doesn't spin anything? But more importantly, it will have details- far more than you will get from any other source. |
|
02-22-2008, 02:13 PM | #203 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Dismissing all the available political commentary as "biased" is a complete red herring. There're better blogs and worse blogs, better talk radio and worse talk radio, better newspapers and worse newspapers, and so on. I suppose I'm simplistic enough to believe the market of ideas sorts out which is which.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
02-22-2008, 02:16 PM | #204 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
It has it's problems, but overall I prefer it to the alternative. Currently voters have the ability to get the information they need to fairly judge a candidate. Whether or not they do is another matter. The one thing I appreciate about the current state of media is that the bias of the presenter is largely apparent, whether it be FoxNews, CNN, talk radio, blogs or the candidates.
|
02-22-2008, 02:19 PM | #205 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2008, 02:20 PM | #206 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2008, 02:23 PM | #207 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
I don't know why you've sunk your pit bull teeth into candidates' white papers. While they are a fine source for what the candidate thinks, whatever analysis they contain are entirely subjective--certainly no better than any random blog.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
02-22-2008, 02:23 PM | #208 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
|
02-22-2008, 04:56 PM | #209 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Memphis freakin' Tennessee!!!!!
Posts: 4,530
|
It's called Obamavision.
__________________
Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!! Religion rises inevitably from our apprehension of our own death. To give meaning to meaninglessness is the endless quest of all religion. When death becomes the center of our consciousness, then religion authentically begins. Of all religions that I know, the one that most vehemently and persuasively defies and denies the reality of death is the original Mormonism of the Prophet, Seer and Revelator, Joseph Smith. |
02-22-2008, 06:53 PM | #210 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|