Stake Conf. Topic: Sexaul Intimacy

[cougarobgon]

Originally Posted by Archaea

Leadership shies away from the topic because leadership is unqualified to address it sociologically or professionally, for the most part. We would have to lean on professionals, not something the lay leadership is wont to do. And that's the problem. If lay leadership can learn to trust good professionals, progress for the benefit of the flock can be made.

I agree, the lay leadership in the Church, for the most part, is not qualified to address this issue and other issues sociologically or professionally. Back when I was the local ward mullah, I replaced a man who was a professional counselor. So those individuals that were seeing him on a regular basis received the benefit of not only spiritual direction, but benefitted from his professional background. When I came on board, I was young, had a business professional background, and immediately my credentials began to be questioned by the regulars. For some, I never replaced that bishop, they followed him to his professional practice for continued guidance. For others, they recognized my position and gladly continued to work with me through the spiritual matters but sought professional help elsewhere. However, there were some that despite their ability to seek professional help, they continued to see me and we worked through their issues. I never discouraged people from seeking professional help and for some I encouraged them to do so. I could help them work through their spirituality, but, for some members (yes more than one) who were contemplating suicide, or had sexuality dysfunctions, etc...I recognized my limitations and recommended they see a professional counselor.

I appreciate the SP addressing this issue that he desribed being the cause of divorces in our stake. I am just curious about why the follow up with the RS sisters and not the Priesthood bretheren. I will wait for my wife's report after the meeting takes place.