cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2008, 06:39 PM   #21
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
Stuck in the 80's? Well in case I was, I went and checked on unemployment rates now per Wikipedia.

Seems the European Countries I mentioned all have higher rates than we do. As a matter of fact so does the UK. This even after they have been moving toward less taxation.

Our unemployment rate is lower than all of theirs and yet the dems call our economy sick and the way to fix it is raise taxes??

Mike, when it comes to debating financial matters go find yourself a financial midget to do battle with so it will be a fair fight.
link?

(btw, I assume you have heard analysis that sometimes unemployment can be TOO low. I assume you understand that. And how comparing 5.3% to 5.9% is pretty worthless in determining the strength of an economy).
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 06:42 PM   #22
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
link?

(btw, I assume you have heard analysis that sometimes unemployment can be TOO low. I assume you understand that. And how comparing 5.3% to 5.9% is pretty worthless in determining the strength of an economy).

It is bad for it to be too low if we are having labor shortages. I don't think we are there yet. If so, we would expect the economy to start overheating and perhaps experience wage driven inflation.

I am not sure about this comparison of UE rates, however. Do the generous social benefits available in most European economies affect their structural rate of unemployment?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 06:48 PM   #23
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
link?

(btw, I assume you have heard analysis that sometimes unemployment can be TOO low. I assume you understand that. And how comparing 5.3% to 5.9% is pretty worthless in determining the strength of an economy).
This is so fun to have a debate with you on this issue. 5.3 vs 5.9 is a 10% difference. Do you have any idea how our markets would be reacting now if our rate went to 5.9. You think Obama is screaming about all the folks without jobs now, how loud do you think he would be screaming then.

.3% which is the diff between the US and UK would be even considered a big deal. Now lets look at France 7.5 and Germany 8.4 or even our pals up north, Canada 6.0. Do you think those are big differences?
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 06:52 PM   #24
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
It is bad for it to be too low if we are having labor shortages. I don't think we are there yet. If so, we would expect the economy to start overheating and perhaps experience wage driven inflation.

I am not sure about this comparison of UE rates, however. Do the generous social benefits available in most European economies affect their structural rate of unemployment?

That's another argument. Maybe high unemployment is really good for the masses, because it indicates the government is more concerned about a fair distribution of wealth than the economy. It didn't work for the Russian communists, maybe it is for the Chinese.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 06:55 PM   #25
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
That's another argument. Maybe high unemployment is really good for the masses, because it indicates the government is more concerned about a fair distribution of wealth than the economy. It didn't work for the Russian communists, maybe it is for the Chinese.
THat's not what I mean. Full employment is an UE rate of something like 4.5% to 5.5% becaseu we will never have 0% UE as some UE is built in to the economy. I was just wondering if the amount of such structural UE is affected by the social welfare state systems. IOW, maybe a higher rate is Full Employment for them. I have no idea, just musing.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:03 PM   #26
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
THat's not what I mean. Full employment is an UE rate of something like 4.5% to 5.5% becaseu we will never have 0% UE as some UE is built in to the economy. I was just wondering if the amount of such structural UE is affected by the social welfare state systems. IOW, maybe a higher rate is Full Employment for them. I have no idea, just musing.
I don't know. I know unemployment rate is used as an indicator of how well the economy is doing. Ours has been so good for so long it appears to have lost some of its impact.

Full employment is 4.5 and we are at 5 and everyone is screaming how lousy this economy is? The point I was making though was taxes and social type programs and their effect on employment. It appears that unemployment is coming down in countries like Germany and France where a more conservative leader has been chosen.

However, here in america we are looking for change. That change will be higher taxes and higher unemployment. Maybe what we get in return will be worth it. I dont' think so, but at least I wish the libs would make that argument instead of pretending they can give us the socialist agenda and an economy as strong as the one we have had.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:20 PM   #27
BlueHair
Senior Member
 
BlueHair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,148
BlueHair is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
It is bad for it to be too low if we are having labor shortages. I don't think we are there yet. If so, we would expect the economy to start overheating and perhaps experience wage driven inflation.

I am not sure about this comparison of UE rates, however. Do the generous social benefits available in most European economies affect their structural rate of unemployment?
We have had labor shortages for years. That is the reason we need the illegal aliens. If we suddenly deported all of the illegals, the shortage would do just as you said - cause dramatic wage driven inflation.
BlueHair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:23 PM   #28
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueHair View Post
We have had labor shortages for years. That is the reason we need the illegal aliens. If we suddenly deported all of the illegals, the shortage would do just as you said - cause dramatic wage driven inflation.
Which is why we need to completely overhaul our legal immigration process: to allow more people to quickly and legally immigrate to this country to fill the labor shortage.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:24 PM   #29
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueHair View Post
We have had labor shortages for years. That is the reason we need the illegal aliens. If we suddenly deported all of the illegals, the shortage would do just as you said - cause dramatic wage driven inflation.
Not really, beacseu the illegals are here, so there has been no shortage.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:28 PM   #30
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy Coug View Post
Which is why we need to completely overhaul our legal immigration process: to allow more people to quickly and legally immigrate to this country to fill the labor shortage.
Let's see. We are ticked at how many jobs are being shipped overseas and yet we need immigrants to come in because we don't have enough people here to fill the jobs that are here.

Does it boil down that the good jobs are going overseas and it is the crap jobs that stay here and we need immigrants to fill. If that is the case though, if we bring all those good jobs back home, who will fill them.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.