PAC. So if your claim of being a

[PaloAltoCougar]

Originally Posted by exUte

So you prefer no subject line..........like this? Talk about intolerance..... because my style is different than yours?

Crap, in five minutes you abandon the subject line schtick and even offer what I assume is a bit of uncharacteristic self-mocking: "However my claim of superiority is truthful." Let this be the start of a new board persona.

Still, I have my doubts, and I'm watching you. Snake eyes, my friend, snake eyes....

[Flystripper]

Originally Posted by Gidget

What I want to know is why it is important to keep putting your opening line in the subject heading?

There are only 2 possible reasons he continues to do this despite many requests that he stop:

1. He is a complete and moron and has the IQ of a moldy turnip or
2. He is a total douchbag and persists solely because it is annoying.

Either reason fits. Take your pick.

**EDIT** I see that for the first time in his visits to this board ExUte changed his posting ways. I guess Number 1 wasn't the reason. Lets see if his douchbaggery lessens a bit with this new event

[il Padrino Ute]

Originally Posted by Archaea

You'all think and act alike when we accuse exUte of belonging to you, eh?

.

Much better.

[RC Vikings]

Originally Posted by exUte

So you prefer no subject line..........like this? Talk about intolerance..... because my style is different than yours?

Baby steps everyone. It's only taken a couple of years to get him from posting in the subject line. Maybe in the next twenty years he can become someone who is thoughtful and considerate of others.

[exUte]

Originally Posted by Archaea

Of Others generally yes, of your intolerant rantings and claims to superiority, no. And you're old enough to know better but too young to be crotchety.

Please refer to the panties Gidget was talking about.

Are you the jerk I sold my BYU tickets to last year? Sheesh. Was that a bad deal!

[exUte]

Originally Posted by Flystripper

There are only 2 possible reasons he continues to do this despite many requests that he stop:

1. He is a complete and moron and has the IQ of a moldy turnip or
2. He is a total douchbag and persists solely because it is annoying.

Either reason fits. Take your pick.

**EDIT** I see that for the first time in his visits to this board ExUte changed his posting ways. I guess Number 1 wasn't the reason. Lets see if his douchbaggery lessens a bit with this new event

What are you? An Enron auditor?

[creekster]

Originally Posted by exUte

Please refer to the panties Gidget was talking about.

Are you the jerk I sold my BYU tickets to last year? Sheesh. Was that a bad deal!

I think she was talking about your panties.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by exUte

Please refer to the panties Gidget was talking about.

Are you the jerk I sold my BYU tickets to last year? Sheesh. Was that a bad deal!

So I'm wrong, you're not too young to be crotchety?

[Goatnapper'96]

Originally Posted by PaloAltoCougar

Your post is offensive for multiple reasons, including the reference to my "claim" as having served as a bishop. I was thankful and humbled to be asked to serve, and I did so for several years to the best of my ability, such as it was. Even though you deserve a decidedly different response, I'll answer your questions honestly and sincerely: I would have read the First Presidency's letter as is, including the parts about tolerance and accepting whatever level of participation each member felt was appropriate. I would not have expressed my doubts or concerns to the ward in any meeting, nor would I have contradicted in private anything I said in public.

Had they been presented by a thoughtful person genuinely interested in discussion, your questions would be worthy of discussion. But your palpable self-satisfaction and condescension over the years, with never a hint of self-awareness or self-doubt, make you a very unpleasant person to deal with on the boards. Thus, with that, exUte, I'm through with you. Until you can (a) post without sounding consistently like an intolerant jerk, and (b) desist in your intentionally obnoxious use of the title line for part of your message, I have no interest in conversing with you.

In rural Idaho we would have said "Fuck off!" Serious, even our Bishops.

[The Comforter]

Originally Posted by exUte

bishop is true, what would you have done when asked to read the letter from the 1st Presidency re: Proposition 8? Read it as is? Comment during Sac Mtg? Share your views in RS or Priesthood? Share your views privately with members who ask what they should do?

I don't understand, why so much anger?