if any of you have been concerned with the poor quality of SU's posts - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

MikeWaters · 10-14-2008, 09:45 PM

hold on, it's going to get a helluva lot worse.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/diet....age/index.html

SeattleUte · 10-14-2008, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

hold on, it's going to get a helluva lot worse.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/diet....age/index.html

No. You were right the first time. I don't take my drinking very seriously.

MikeWaters · 10-14-2008, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

No. You were right the first time. I don't take my drinking very seriously.

I think it says even small amounts do this, the amounts that some had recommended for cardiovascular health (even though there may be no CV benefit after all).

You are screwed.

TripletDaddy · 10-14-2008, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

No. You were right the first time. I don't take my drinking very seriously.

Shocker.

SeattleUte · 10-14-2008, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

Shocker.

Wrong again, my gimlet.

landpoke · 10-14-2008, 10:15 PM

It's an extra 0.03%. I'll take my chances.

MikeWaters · 10-14-2008, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by landpoke

It's an extra 0.03%. I'll take my chances.

No it says that it is less than 1.5%. In other words, about 50 times greater than what you just said. But who's counting. Hell, in WY that extra 1.5% is an unneeded luxury.

landpoke · 10-14-2008, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

No it says that it is less than 1.5%. In other words, about 50 times greater than what you just said. But who's counting. Hell, in WY that extra 1.5% is an unneeded luxury.

"And the differences between brain volumes in drinkers and nondrinkers were quite small -- less than 1.5 percent between abstainers and heavy drinkers."

I read it as 1.5% of the 2% non-drinker loss which equals the number I quoted. Regardless, I'll take my chances.

MikeWaters · 10-14-2008, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by landpoke

"And the differences between brain volumes in drinkers and nondrinkers were quite small -- less than 1.5 percent between abstainers and heavy drinkers."

I read it as 1.5% of the 2% non-drinker loss which equals the number I quoted. Regardless, I'll take my chances.

Your alma mater is what?

landpoke · 10-14-2008, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

Your alma mater is what?

Where am I wrong?

10-14-2008, 09:45 PM	#1
MikeWaters Demiurge Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 36,365	if any of you have been concerned with the poor quality of SU's posts hold on, it's going to get a helluva lot worse. http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/diet....age/index.html

10-14-2008, 10:15 PM	#6
landpoke Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: North Central God's Country Posts: 1,534	It's an extra 0.03%. I'll take my chances. __________________ I see a hobo. And when I see the hobo, I think to myself, "This man is poor. His monetary value is low, and my monetary value is high, and it's a shame that he is himself. What can I do?"