04-03-2007, 01:33 AM | #61 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
Also, possessing child pornography is illegal, although merely viewing it is not. If the girls possessed pornographic pictures of themselves and each other, I believe that is a crime.
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
|
04-03-2007, 02:20 AM | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I... Isn't it so fun to spell?
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
I don't think we completely disagree on this issue. My original post was merely intended to counter Rocky's whining, but somehow I mixed myself up in a debate for which I, thankfully, have no firsthand experience. I am fine with woman offenders being treated like their Priesthood counterparts. I know this will probably sound a little wishy washy, but, as long as men hold the governing power in the church, I am also fine with women receiving a milder rebuke for the same offense.
__________________
"Mormon men are inherently sexy..." -Archaea |
|
04-03-2007, 02:23 AM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I... Isn't it so fun to spell?
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Nonetheless, I did not know that it was illegal for a minor to take sexually explicit photos of herself. It makes sense though. Thanks for the legal explanation.
__________________
"Mormon men are inherently sexy..." -Archaea |
|
04-03-2007, 02:40 AM | #64 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
04-03-2007, 02:45 AM | #65 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
viewing child porn is not a crime? so if someone is browsing child porn that is not a crime? but if the images are cached then it is a crime?
|
04-03-2007, 02:55 AM | #66 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
|
04-03-2007, 02:59 AM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Jordan
Posts: 1,725
|
|
04-03-2007, 03:01 AM | #68 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
From one of the Twelve in Stake Conference, confirmed again to me by my stake conference and my bishop just recently.
Basically, by excommunicating, you're saying goodbye to the member. It takes up to seven years to be back in good standing with blessings reinstated.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
04-03-2007, 03:19 AM | #69 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
|
04-03-2007, 03:21 AM | #70 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
That's not full fellowship. The next stage, reinstatement of blessings lasts a long, long time. It requires a General Authority to perform it.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
Bookmarks |
|
|