cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Art/Movies/Media/Music/Books
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2007, 02:28 AM   #11
YOhio
AKA SeattleNewt
 
YOhio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
YOhio is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by non sequitur View Post
Other than the assertion that BY ordered the hit, what assertions do you disagree with?
I would have to see the movie to combat specific assertions the movie makes. Without seeing the movie, here are the things I'm concerned about:

1- The habit of filmmakers to present a dichotomy between good and evil, i.e. the Baker-Fancher party being 100% pure and the Mormon's being 100% evil.

2- The lack of context the film will provide. Specifically in relation to the political situation surrounding the Mormons, the treatment the LDS received in the Eastern United States, the context of BY's sayings, Parley Pratt's murder, and the behavior of LDS towards other settler parties.

3- It's silly to make such a serious and important movie and then center it around a love story. I really don't like that approach.

It appears that Novak watched the film without attempting to understand the entire context of the massacre. I'm not saying that my above stated concerns justify the massacre, but to not show them in the film gives a distorted history. Not all Mormon's who lived in 1850's Utah were evil, murdering barbarians. I will be surprised if filmgoer's leave this film with that impression.

Quote:
Originally Posted by non sequitur View Post
Can you really blame Jon Voight for reaching the conclusion that BY ordered the MMM? Granted, it has never been proved, but neither has it been proved that O.J. slit his wife's throat. Most objective people who examine the facts would conclude the BY was involved.
You're the one who said that Voigt didn't implicate BY in MMM. I could care less what he thinks. Your final statement is a tad overstated.
YOhio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:00 AM   #12
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

I recently went to a museum not far from my house called "The Nordic Museum." The neighborhood on the other side from where I live of the canal between Lake Union and Puget Sound was settled by Norwegians, Danes, Swedish, etc.

Two things at the museum made me think of Mormons. First, the depictions of Jesus were the same as I grew up with as a child, including a sculpture exactly like the Christus that kept recurring. It turns out the Christus is a replica of a famous sculpture by a Scandinavian that has been replicated many times. It made me think of how important Scandinavians were among the earliest Mormons, whose ancestors still are prevalent--all those Jensens, Sorensens, Swensens, etc.

Second, there was a large old map of the United States painted on a plywood board hung on the wall. Abstracts were written all across the map describing important events in U.S. history. At a spot in southern Utah there was written, "Brigham Young orders the slaughter of 120 settlers from Arkansas by Mormons disguised as Piute Indians and Piute allies." It made me think that maybe outside my bred in the bone Mormon perspective rightly or wrongly Brigham Young's participation is taken as more of a given than I ever realized.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 05:36 AM   #13
All-American
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,420
All-American is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to All-American
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
I recently went to a museum not far from my house called "The Nordic Museum." The neighborhood on the other side from where I live of the canal between Lake Union and Puget Sound was settled by Norwegians, Danes, Swedish, etc.

Two things at the museum made me think of Mormons. First, the depictions of Jesus were the same as I grew up with as a child, including a sculpture exactly like the Christus that kept recurring. It turns out the Christus is a replica of a famous sculpture by a Scandinavian that has been replicated many times. It made me think of how important Scandinavians were among the earliest Mormons, whose ancestors still are prevalent--all those Jensens, Sorensens, Swensens, etc.

Second, there was a large old map of the United States painted on a plywood board hung on the wall. Abstracts were written all across the map describing important events in U.S. history. At a spot in southern Utah there was written, "Brigham Young orders the slaughter of 120 settlers from Arkansas by Mormons disguised as Piute Indians and Piute allies." It made me think that maybe outside my bred in the bone Mormon perspective rightly or wrongly Brigham Young's participation is taken as more of a given than I ever realized.
Thorvaldsen, "Christus." I admit, he's probably a better sculptor than I am.

Here's the original. Note the twelve apostles flanking the aisles, as well.

__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος
All-American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 02:50 PM   #14
Sleeping in EQ
Senior Member
 
Sleeping in EQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
Sleeping in EQ is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I'll be seeing the film, and probably with an agnostic colleague or two.
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV)

We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
Sleeping in EQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:04 PM   #15
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Two things are discouraging me from seeing it. First, the "evil looking portrait" of Brigham Young makes it appear to be a hit piece.

Second, comments from Voigt make it sound as if they know withtout a shadow of a doubt that BY ordered the manslaughter. He may have created the social atmosphere or at least a part thereof, but nobody can honestly say, given the time consuming and limited communication we had over distance what BY knew. So, if a person is adamant in his conclusions, this movie cannot be profound. It sounds like a B-rated movie.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:30 PM   #16
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

When it comes to movies with religious themes, I don't think people really believe what is in the movie anyway.

I know when I watched "Witness", it didn't change my mind and make me think the Ammish had hot looking women who were willing to show their hooters.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:34 PM   #17
FMCoug
Senior Member
 
FMCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaysville, UT
Posts: 3,151
FMCoug
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
I know when I watched "Witness", it didn't change my mind and make me think the Ammish had hot looking women who were willing to show their hooters.
Having served in Amish country in one of my areas, I can testify to the truthfulness of this post.
FMCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:35 PM   #18
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
Having served in Amish country in one of my areas, I can testify to the truthfulness of this post.
do they show their hooters or not?
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:41 PM   #19
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

What a beautiful chruch. Thanks, AA. Where is it?
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 04:50 PM   #20
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by non sequitur View Post
Other than the assertion that BY ordered the hit, what assertions do you disagree with?

Can you really blame Jon Voight for reaching the conclusion that BY ordered the MMM? Granted, it has never been proved, but neither has it been proved that O.J. slit his wife's throat. Most objective people who examine the facts would conclude the BY was involved.
Juanita Brooks didn't believe that, and she was objective. You might believe McMurtry is not objective, but the McMurtry approach appears more scholarly than most.

Point to me an objective historian who is certain BY ordered and knew of the murders.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.