11-30-2006, 08:24 PM | #21 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Rule number 2, don't tell your wife she should not be offended.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
11-30-2006, 08:54 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
|
Anyone can spew forth a bunch of bullshit to fit their argument. We see it on here all the time, so of course they could make an argument, but a pretty good one? Not unless they want to be taken seriously.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
11-30-2006, 09:02 PM | #23 | |
Charon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the heart of darkness (Provo)
Posts: 9,564
|
Quote:
Furthermore, no one ever claimed it was religous bigotry. Go back and read NS's post. Relax, buddy.
__________________
"... the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice." Martin Luther King, Jr. |
|
11-30-2006, 09:21 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And I'm keenly aware of the differences beware what an agnostic and atheist is. And I still don't think someone can make a rational argument that atheism is a religion.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
|
11-30-2006, 09:30 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
Atheists or materialists don't have anyting like "faith" in the absense of God. What they believe is that anything you can't perceive with your senses is of no account. In fact they do practice a complete absense of faith; it's a discipline. They don't believe that "spirituality" is anyting other than emotion, until their senses tell them otherwise, that is. If they were to experience anything like Joseph Smith's "First Vision" they'd believe in God without having to adjust their basic outlook one whit. Democritus and Epicurus are enormously underrated in their importance to Western culture. They are the true fathers of the scientific method. Aristotle and Plato are much more revered because they were the first humans to articulate a dichotomy between the carnal body and the soul, and the early Christians and later middle ages Christians incorporated their philsophies wholesale into Christianity; Plato even much influenced Paul's development of the idea of an atonement. But Epicurus dismissed his rough contemporary Plato as spinnr of fantasies. Again, I refer everyone to the magnificent epic poem "On the Nature of Things" also called "The Way Things Are" for a brilliant and beautiful articulation of this outlook.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 11-30-2006 at 09:33 PM. |
|
11-30-2006, 09:42 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norcal
Posts: 5,821
|
If he is then that misunderstanding extends to many agnostics. I've heard Lebowski's exact definition from the lips of just about every agnostic with whom I associate (there are several).
|
11-30-2006, 09:46 PM | #27 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
You're all a little right and a little wrong.
Sovran Maxim http://www.epicurus.net/en/principal.html http://www.epicurus.net/en/history.html I'll also link some Democritus in another post. Democritus was known more as an atomist, which is what Newton actually became. http://www-groups.dcs.st-andrews.ac....emocritus.html
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα Last edited by Archaea; 11-30-2006 at 09:51 PM. |
11-30-2006, 09:46 PM | #28 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
They don't realize that there's not much difference betweem themselves and atheists. Most atheists are scientists, and intellecutals or academics, in my experience. Their "belief" in the absense of God is more like a presumption grounded in common earthly experience. People may prefer to call themseleves agnostics because "atheist" has a negative connotation, partly from the misconception that they have something like faith in the absense of God. They don't. They claim only to know what their senses tell them.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
11-30-2006, 09:46 PM | #29 | |
Charon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the heart of darkness (Provo)
Posts: 9,564
|
Quote:
Nevertheless.... when you say "I think there's not a lot of difference between agnostics and atheists.", I have to agree based on your definition of an atheist. Now I would like to read your definition of an agnostic. When you say: "If they were to experience anything like Joseph Smith's 'First Vision' they'd believe in God without having to adjust their basic outlook one whit." I understand your point. But most atheists I have known are dead sure that there is no God and use every opportunity to ridicule believers. It seems to me that such an experience would be shattering to an atheist since it would turn their world view upside down and completely disprove the "there is no such thing as a spiritual world" mindset. In other words, when one says "spirituality is nothing more than emotion", isn't that a statement of belief, to a degree? How can one definitively prove such a thing?
__________________
"... the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice." Martin Luther King, Jr. |
|
11-30-2006, 09:53 PM | #30 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|