cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Religion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2016, 04:13 AM   #11
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
It is not a challenge, but a request for reasonable proof. Just because there was fascination with Egyptian materials, which are not inherently Islamic as they pre-date Islam, that seems odd to assert the primitive folk of upstate New York had much of an understanding of the Shia/Sunni dynamics of Islam and its tenets. There wasn't even a decent English translation of the Quran until Yusuf Ali completed his in 1934. The Holy Qur'an: Translation and Commentary (1934) by Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

Mohammed does form perhaps an archetype of the warrior/prophet whose calling commences with a vision of God and his angels. In that sense, what the archetype set up in the charismatic sense is analogous to Joseph Smith, but to state categorically that Joseph Smith knowingly emulated a man he could hardly known much about, given the lack of materials in English with much understanding. Early translations from Arabic, Urdu, Turkish and Farsi into workable English seem hardly likely to make to it to an uneducated farm boy in upstate New York.

It more likely possible that the sociological conditions which allow charismatic figures to create a following recur from time to time, as shown by numerous charismatic "prophets" throughout the ages.

Moreover, Islam won over its minions through martial conquest and the LDS faith is now floundering because it is unable to control the information flow and is unable find a central message for new adherents. The Caliphates and Umayyads were well-established within 150 years, but 750 CE, leading the growth under the Abbasids, Seljuks and Ottomans over the centuries.

In many respects, absent moderation and attachment to a growing economy or world empire, the LDS faith is unlikely to see such growth and domination.
Look, I'm not saying that Islam was or was not a model for LDS founding myth, theology, etc. But you will never convince me that Islam was not well known in nineteenth century United States. During the Romantic Age there was renewed interest in medieval times, religion, etc. In the great drama and pageantry of medieval warfare and associated game of thrones the lines ultimately were drawn between Europe and Islam. There were multiple epic poems demonizing Muslims as the great adversary. Islam occupied Jerusalem and the Holy Land, having survived the onslaught of the Crusades, generating a lot of psychic pain in Christians that had lasted for ages. The Ottoman Empire was still a superpower. Muslims were feared and loathed, though they carried a strong mystique. This hate/admiration if anything heightened Islam's attraction as a model.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=romantic+age+Islam
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 03:16 PM   #12
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
Look, I'm not saying that Islam was or was not a model for LDS founding myth, theology, etc. But you will never convince me that Islam was not well known in nineteenth century United States. During the Romantic Age there was renewed interest in medieval times, religion, etc. In the great drama and pageantry of medieval warfare and associated game of thrones the lines ultimately were drawn between Europe and Islam. There were multiple epic poems demonizing Muslims as the great adversary. Islam occupied Jerusalem and the Holy Land, having survived the onslaught of the Crusades, generating a lot of psychic pain in Christians that had lasted for ages. The Ottoman Empire was still a superpower. Muslims were feared and loathed, though they carried a strong mystique. This hate/admiration if anything heightened Islam's attraction as a model.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=romantic+age+Islam

We may only be arguing small details. Did the history of the Crusades and Islam influence the Romantic Era for literature? Undoubtedly. Did those who were influenced understand the nature and extent of the influence? That is what I am doubtful about. It's analogous to the El Nino effect. Snow storms in NYC may be the result of El Nino in the Pacific Ocean, but that doesn't mean the guy in the ghetto realizes that, unless he's reading up on weather patterns on the internet. In terms of knowledge of world events, upstate New York was backwater and not the place of learned discussions. Cornell University wasn't founded until 1865, well after the Romantic Period.

As far as Islam forming the basis for founding narratives, I would argue it could only do so, if the genesis of such organic structural is the result of natural processes as opposed to conscientious modeling and emulation.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 01-27-2016 at 03:19 PM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.