07-17-2007, 08:26 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Quote:
The latest employment growth has been in the service sector. White collar job supply has declined. This quarter saw an increase in new applications for unemployment. Since 2000, bottom 60% of households have seen a decreased share of the wealth. Home foreclosure rates are at a fifty-year high. The federal budget? Axed scientific research in favor of the war. Grant funding the lowest in decades. That can't be good for the long-term economy. |
|
07-17-2007, 08:31 PM | #32 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
There's even more bad news on the horizon. New car sales are down 27% year over year, GM has quietly laid off entire shifts in several MI plants and we are seeing only the tip of the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Most economists see a bleak second quarter 2008 and beyond. We are a domestic terror attack away from recession. |
|
07-18-2007, 03:01 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
like how Clinton's tax hikes on the wealthy sent the economy down a depression.
|
07-18-2007, 09:02 PM | #34 |
Resident Jackass
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
|
I never said anything abut Clinton...but since you mention it...I agree with all who have stated here that President's get too much credit and to much blame for the overall economy. But, one thing that they can control is the growth of discretionary spending, and in this regard Clinton's record is better than that of Bush.
The economy has been decent under Bush, and partly because of the tax cuts, but without spending restraint and adding a massive new entitlement (prescription drug benefit) the economic gains came at a huge cost to the future fiscal shape of this country. That is my problem with the Bush economic policies. Also, one has to ask oneself whether super low inflation and record low interest rates are actually good in the long term for the economy in light of two enormous bubbles in the last 10 years. I don't think the evidence is clear yet whether it is. It may very well be, but the housing market will have shake out first for the answer to become clear. |
07-18-2007, 09:13 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
I'm pretty simple minded about this stuff.
If Crowton has three losing seasons in a row, it's his fault. If Clinton has eight years in office and leaves with a budget surplus, he did a good job fiscally. If Bush has eight years in office and leaves with a terrible budget deficit, he didn't do a good job. |
07-18-2007, 09:15 PM | #36 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
They did, once the tech bubble burst. We had some very severe times due to the phony tech bubble.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
07-18-2007, 10:03 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
Bubble was caused excessive deregulation b/c Clinton wanted to establish good relations with Wall St. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|