cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2009, 03:39 AM   #1
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default Limbaugh and his ilk

Limbaugh is on record now (twice) saying he "hopes Obama's policies fail." What a twisted and despicable thing to say. Even more despicable given that he is the de facto head of the Republican Party.

At CPAC, Santorum and DeLay agreed wholeheartedly with Rush that they also hope the economic recovery plans of Obama fail.

Are you on board with that, Tex? Or are you openly opposed to Limbaugh, who you have said represents true conservative values, the kind of values Republicans always win with when they run?
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 04:02 AM   #2
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Like as in they hope that his efforts to prop up the housing bubble by rewarding the irresponsible fails?
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 04:06 AM   #3
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
Like as in they hope that his efforts to prop up the housing bubble by rewarding the irresponsible fails?
Amusing that even the response to your silly loaded question should be a resounding "no." Why would you HOPE he and his policies fail? That just doesn't make sense. You may believe they will fail. You may think they are wrongheaded. You may think they are the worst ideas ever adopted by mankind. But why would you HOPE that to be the case? Wouldn't you HOPE they will work and you will be wrong?
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 04:07 AM   #4
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Amusing that even the response to your silly loaded question should be a resounding "no." Why would you HOPE he and his policies fail? That just doesn't make sense. You may believe they will fail. You may think they are wrongheaded. You may think they are the worst ideas ever adopted by mankind. But why would you HOPE that to be the case? Wouldn't you HOPE they will work and you will be wrong?
why would someone hope that the redistribution of income through increased taxes on families at 250k (right?) or higher fail?
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 04:16 AM   #5
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
why would someone hope that the redistribution of income through increased taxes on families at 250k (right?) or higher fail?
Yes. Why would you hope it would fail?

The concern people have with "redistribution of wealth" (which is an absurd term to use in this context) is that it will lead to failure on multiple levels- disincentivization of work and capital accumulation, rewarding slothfulness, increasing poverty and unemployment, etc. So say we implement the policy and none of that happens and, in fact, it raises revenue without any of the negative feared side effects. Wouldn't that be great for the country? Why would you hope it would fail, then? Just so you could be proven correct? Talk about narcissism.

Many of us hope a candidate will lose (because we believe their policies will fail). Many of us hope a party will lose (same reason). Many of us hope a better policy or candidate will prevail. But why hope the policy itself will fail? If it succeeds, you were simply wrong to disagree with the policy in the first place; hoping it will fail is merely hoping you won't be proven wrong.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 01:12 PM   #6
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Heh.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 02:35 PM   #7
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Heh.
Sometimes, that's all you have left.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 03:24 PM   #8
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Sometimes, that's all you have left.
So not worth my time.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 06:18 PM   #9
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Yes. Why would you hope it would fail?

The concern people have with "redistribution of wealth" (which is an absurd term to use in this context) is that it will lead to failure on multiple levels- disincentivization of work and capital accumulation, rewarding slothfulness, increasing poverty and unemployment, etc. So say we implement the policy and none of that happens and, in fact, it raises revenue without any of the negative feared side effects. Wouldn't that be great for the country? Why would you hope it would fail, then? Just so you could be proven correct? Talk about narcissism.
Even when the redistribution of wealth succeeds without the disastrous consequences you mention (and it will succeed), guys like Archaea will say it still isn't "fair" that those making 250K+ get taxed more. Since all the observable evidence in the world shows it's not bad for the economy, the right-wingers run behind some nebulus notion of "fair" over and over again.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 06:25 PM   #10
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
Even when the redistribution of wealth succeeds without the disastrous consequences you mention (and it will succeed), guys like Archaea will say it still isn't "fair" that those making 250K+ get taxed more. Since all the observable evidence in the world shows it's not bad for the economy, the right-wingers run behind some nebulus notion of "fair" over and over again.
Which is why they hope it will fail. They don't want their paradigm challenged, even if it results in a better future for everyone.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.