JHC, McCain should debate!

[PaloAltoCougar]

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

You don't think Gore is gorgeous?

The pictures of him in uniform had me in his thrall, but then he apparently discovered the siren song of triple cheeseburgers and the spell was broken.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by FMCoug

I didn't think your statement required a response.

Dare you deign to ignore the presence of the SeattleUte? You will speak when spoken to.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by PaloAltoCougar

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

Nobody ever said that about Cheney, Gore or even the dashing Spiro Agnew. I think I'm on board with McCain/Palin.


[Note: I thought I was creating a new, if utterly worthless, thread. Sorry to have littered this one.]

PAC we like you so we'll go easy on you, but nobody but Exie uses the title line to insert material in the middle of the thread. Do you wish to be included in any statement that goes, "PAC and Exie both....."?

We leave you to ponder your mistake.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by Archaea

PAC we like you so we'll go easy on you, but nobody but Exie uses the title line to insert material in the middle of the thread. Do you wish to be included in any statement that goes, "PAC and Exie both....."?

We leave you to ponder your mistake.

In his defense, PAC uses the title bar to insert a, you know, title.

exUte just starts his sentence there, follows with a quote in the body of the post, then completes his thought, FWIW.

[PaloAltoCougar]

Originally Posted by Archaea

PAC we like you so we'll go easy on you, but nobody but Exie uses the title line to insert material in the middle of the thread. Do you wish to be included in any statement that goes, "PAC and Exie both....."?

We leave you to ponder your mistake.

Trust me, the first thing I thought of when my post popped up in this thread was "Crap, the title line message is positively exUteian." I swear I wrote the line with the expectation that the post would be the first in a new thread, but I guess that doesn't absolve me of blame. Well screw you all; I join my brother, exUte, in giving the finger to your tiresome board conventions.

[PaloAltoCougar]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

In his defense, PAC uses the title bar to insert a, you know, title.

exUte just starts his sentence there, follows with a quote in the body of the post, then completes his thought, FWIW.

Thanks sister; you can visit my tree house anytime. The rest of you buzz off.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by PaloAltoCougar

Thanks sister; you can visit my tree house anytime. The rest of you buzz off.

problem.

[8ballrollin]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

I can't help but wonder if McCain is hoping to stall a little while while he and his advisers complete their gameplan for the new debate format.

I don't buy it.

You don't bust out the no-Friday-night-debate-unless-an-economic-bailout-deal-is-reached move over mere format.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by 8ballrollin

I don't buy it.

You don't bust out the no-Friday-night-debate-unless-an-economic-bailout-deal-is-reached move over mere format.

Perhaps, but one also doesn't generally throw a hissy fit when one's runningmate is expected to debate.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by PaloAltoCougar

Thanks sister; you can visit my tree house anytime. The rest of you buzz off.

Well that makes it all the better. is it next to the pca (in order of creektser) mansion?