11-05-2007, 04:58 PM | #51 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Your evidence about giving tickets away to 2 or 3 games however flies in the face of the true statistics. People were not more interested in watching BYU play from 2000-2005 with better quality opponents at home. BYU had their lowest average attendance during those years since before the stadium expansion. I do wonder if Indy is upset that I am agreeing with him on this. I think he has me ignored on CB. |
|
11-05-2007, 05:04 PM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Quote:
Every game this year after the AZ game, you could bought a ticket for less than half face value outside the stadium. |
|
11-05-2007, 05:04 PM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
Quote:
|
|
11-05-2007, 05:09 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
I will also bet the games against ND and USC and GT and Syracuse, etc. were better sold than the games against the teams we were sure bets to win. As long as BYU is winning and winning the conference, attendance will be just fine as long as they don't drop the UCLA's and replace them with the UTEPS. |
|
11-05-2007, 05:09 PM | #55 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 280
|
|
11-05-2007, 05:15 PM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
The way I figure it the schedule was good enough this year at home that the price of $660 for a season ticket was worth it. Next year is a rip off unless you consider a UCLA ticket is worth $510 and the rest of the tickets are worth $30 a piece. That is of course unless they raise prices again, not that those who don't buy tickets would notice. |
|
11-05-2007, 05:28 PM | #57 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 280
|
[QUOTE=BYU71;146147]That of course means nothing to some guy who doesn't buy tickets and just looks at statistics.QUOTE]
Nice dig, here I thought CG was so much smarter and civilized than CB. I am sorry that facts of attendance don't line up with your theory regarding giving tickets away to people in your blood line. The facts that you don't care to research and then mock someone who is willing to make a fact based argument is that when we were playing the Bowling Green, Long Beach State and Temples of the world there was so much demand for tickets that the stadium expanded by 20,000 seats. When we were playing the USC, BSU, ND, Boston Colleges of the world we weren't selling out the stadium. For the bulk of fans, which are the people that fill the seats it is about winning games against anyone not about playing high profile teams. For the last 5 years I have had problems giving away my 8 tickets on weeks I couldn't make it down even for the high profile games. Last year I had no problem giving away tickets to the games I wasn't able to come to, surprise we were good. Had BYU sold me tickets this year I doubt I would have had a hard time this year either. |
11-05-2007, 05:37 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
[QUOTE=HuskyFreeNorthwest;146159][QUOTE=BYU71;146147]That of course means nothing to some guy who doesn't buy tickets and just looks at statistics.QUOTE]
Nice dig, here I thought CG was so much smarter and civilized than CB. I am sorry that facts of attendance don't line up with your theory regarding giving tickets away to people in your blood line. The facts that you don't care to research and then mock someone who is willing to make a fact based argument is that when we were playing the Bowling Green, Long Beach State and Temples of the world there was so much demand for tickets that the stadium expanded by 20,000 seats. My post response: This thing has gone back and forth so much I want to make it clear what we are arguing about. I am saying that if we dummy down the schedule more than it is already, eventually that will hurt season ticket sales. Are you disagreeing with that. |
11-05-2007, 06:02 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
If we consistently win 10 to 12 games a year and are perpetually in the top 25, yes I do.
|
11-05-2007, 06:03 PM | #60 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 280
|
I am saying that if BYU is winning 9+ games every year that it won't matter who they play.
I think you and I can agree that WE (meaning you and I) would both like to play better teams, I would rather see LSU, Oklahoma, USC, Virginia etc in LES and BYU lose than Tulsa and Nevada. The facts about people attending the games just prove the opposite. From 1977-1992 when BYU sold out every game of the season BYU played the following OOC games 77-Kansas St. (who would be like Vandy not the KSU of today) Arizona and Long Beach State. 78-Utah State, all other OOC games were on the road, featuring powerhouses like Oregon State, Oregon and UNLV. 79-Weber State, all other OOC games were on the road including Long Beach State. 80-Long Beach State, North Texas State. 81-Utah State, UNLV The fact that we went 52-10 through those years made it so that ticket demand was enought to increase the stadium capacity by 50%. 82-No non-conf home games. 83-Bowling Green and Utah State 84-Baylor, Tulsa and Utah State 85-UCLA and Washington 86-Utah State, Temple and Oregon State 87-Pitt and Utah State 88-Texas, Utah State and TCU 89-Washington State and Oregon 90-Miami, Washington State and Utah State 91-Utah State 92-UCLA, Utah State and Penn State Following 92 BYU did start to get better games on the schedule and started winning a lot less. Attendance went down and BYU from 1993-2000 years of LaVell only averaged capacity during the 1999 year. So in case you have missed my answer, yes fans care more about winning than schedule. If BYU is winning 9-10 games a year we can play Long Beach State and Bowling Green and the fans will show up, or at least buy the tickets and donate which at the end of the day is all this is about. Last edited by HuskyFreeNorthwest; 11-05-2007 at 06:07 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|