cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2007, 02:39 AM   #31
Lost Student
Member
 
Lost Student's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Posts: 261
Lost Student is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
Lost:

higher. you said yourself that we will gain from trade, and that both sides will benefit. how can our standard of living get lower?

you can't "average out" when both sides are going up.

trade will definitely affect the distribution of wealth in the US. due to globalization, median wages have remained stagnant while major gains have been made at the top.
I guess I see a point eventually where the gains are being made by so few at the top compared with the rest of the country that the middle class is essentially wiped out.

Let me reiterate though: I beleive that a free market, with as little government intervention as possible, is best. It's just that I see a point of diminishing returns for the "common man." Again, where that point is, I do not know.
Lost Student is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:41 AM   #32
Lost Student
Member
 
Lost Student's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Posts: 261
Lost Student is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colly Wolly View Post
Barbara, the other countries are giving their kids steroids. It's bad for them in the long run. Don't insist our kids take them too.
LOL. You're really taking the football team metaphor a long ways.
Lost Student is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:42 AM   #33
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Student View Post
I guess I see a point eventually where the gains are being made by so few at the top compared with the rest of the country that the middle class is essentially wiped out.

Let me reiterate though: I beleive that a free market, with as little government intervention as possible, is best. It's just that I see a point of diminishing returns for the "common man." Again, where that point is, I do not know.
google "stolper-samuelson theorem"
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:42 AM   #34
BarbaraGordon
Senior Member
 
BarbaraGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
BarbaraGordon is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
explain to me how our standard of living gets lower when productivity is higher.
How does standard of living NOT decrease when we're competing with societies that happily accept 1/10 of what American workers are accustomed to?
BarbaraGordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:45 AM   #35
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
How does standard of living NOT decrease when we're competing with societies that happily accept 1/10 of what American workers are accustomed to?
cheaper goods-->we can buy more with our money-->we're richer

john edwards' idiotic speech about the the poor girl who couldn't afford a winter coat, when you can buy one at Walmart for $10 thanks to free trade.
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:45 AM   #36
SoonerCoug
Formerly known as MudPhudCoug
 
SoonerCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Land of desolation
Posts: 2,548
SoonerCoug is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Markets need to run freely in a manner most efficient.

Monopolies are not efficient and must therefore be opposed. Monopolies act therefore like governments, sluggish, bloated and inefficient.

Around the fringes some minimal regulation is needed. And society demands certain minimum safety nets.

But the best regulator of the markets are the money supplies.
I openly admit that I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I still like to argue about economics.
SoonerCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:46 AM   #37
Colly Wolly
Senior Member
 
Colly Wolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,281
Colly Wolly is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Ask France how those 30 hour work weeks are going.
Colly Wolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:48 AM   #38
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colly Wolly View Post
Ask France how those 30 hour work weeks are going.
you and lost are cracking me up. you with your analogy, Lost with his avatar.
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:50 AM   #39
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Markets need to run freely in a manner most efficient.
What if the market won't run at all?

Quote:
But the best regulator of the markets are the money supplies.
never heard that b4, maybe you can give me examples.
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 02:54 AM   #40
BarbaraGordon
Senior Member
 
BarbaraGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
BarbaraGordon is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost
I guess I see a point eventually where the gains are being made by so few at the top compared with the rest of the country that the middle class is essentially wiped out.

Let me reiterate though: I beleive that a free market, with as little government intervention as possible, is best. It's just that I see a point of diminishing returns for the "common man." Again, where that point is, I do not know.
This is EXACTLY what I'm trying to say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
cheaper goods-->we can buy more with our money-->we're richer
I'm aware of the argument.

I disagree. Ask a Wal-Mart employee where the obsession with cheap goods has gotten us. It's created a standard of non-living wages for a huge section of the American workforce. They can't even afford the "cheap" goods.

All the cheap goods market has done is enable the Chinese to buy a whole hell of a lot of oil, increasing costs for us across the board.
BarbaraGordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.