12-27-2007, 09:24 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Several sources after the Nevada pull out indicated we could schedule up. I am not saying a really good BCS team and I am not sure I want that anyway. Mid to lower BCS or Nevada non-BCS equivalent was out there according to several people.
|
12-27-2007, 09:25 PM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
|
|
12-27-2007, 09:27 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Like I said, I'm not going to hang Bronco for the replacement for the Nevada game, because it's a legitimate problem to replace a team that late. My ire is directed at a long term philosophy but I think it's uncertain yet how that will affect us. The Army and USU contracts were the last two that were done.
|
12-27-2007, 09:32 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
|
|
12-27-2007, 09:38 PM | #55 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
All it would take is some AD saying "we offered but they said no" and suddenly Bronco isn't a prophet anymore. he is the new Elder Stapely. |
|
12-27-2007, 09:40 PM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Valid point. I think though what he is saying negates the fact for those who are saying no way can we get better than a 1AA to slide in for Nevada.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|