|
10-17-2007, 02:09 PM | #1 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
|
|
10-17-2007, 02:12 PM | #2 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Is the Bishop still in the military? I imagine it would be hard on a ward for the Bishop to be gone for a couple of years during his tenure.
|
10-17-2007, 02:22 PM | #3 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
We've had members of the military in our ward, and have a current lad in Afghanistan. We also have a military base in town, but to single LDS out for not serving may be silly. IMHO, it's more of a class item than a cultural item. For most upper middle classes, the military is not the first choice, unless family traditions dictate otherwise.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
10-17-2007, 02:31 PM | #4 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Utah is 48th in enlistment.
Utah is 12th in terms of median income, btw. http://nationalpriorities.org/index....=175&Itemid=61) |
10-18-2007, 02:07 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 28
|
|
10-18-2007, 02:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
My ward has 2 FT mnisionaries and one YW and one YM that have entered the armed forces within the last year or two.
WHen we were first married, my wife and I came THIS close to entering the Peace Corps (and I had already served a FT mission) but we were actually discouraged by the Corps itself becasue they told us that they didn't like to send couples to the same place unless one fo them had a hard science or practical skill of some sort to share. We were both liberal arts types that were both likley going to be teaching English and they didn't really want us as a couple, so we moved on.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
10-18-2007, 02:52 PM | #7 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Impressed that so many of your kids are serving in the military. I don't know a single person in my parts.
|
10-18-2007, 03:18 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
|
|
10-18-2007, 03:22 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
I think that was exactly what they were trying to avoid. In a way, it was a sort of subtle sexism. The recruiter we met with (a woman in Berkeley, CA) kept talking about how it would be fine if my wife could teach English and I could teach engineering or design water systems, or design building foundations and some such. In all the scenarios and possible locations she always pointed out that my wife could easiyl teach English but i was the loser for not haveng a hard science or practical skill background. We met several times and they kept suggesting we go to different locations (as in differnet countries). We were resistant, being married and all.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
Bookmarks |
|
|