cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Other College Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2008, 09:42 PM   #11
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,363
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelBlue View Post
Yes, you would probably have top 16 times.
much more likely to be top 16 in swimming, than top 16 in <insert almost every major sport>.

I knew a guy at BYU who was on his high school water polo team. I'll bet he would have been the top water polo person in Texas if he was there. Since he would be the only one who had played. Water polor = niche sport.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 09:44 PM   #12
SteelBlue
Senior Member
 
SteelBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norcal
Posts: 5,821
SteelBlue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
much more likely to be top 16 in swimming, than top 16 in <insert almost every major sport>.
When more likely is still next to impossible I don't think it matters much. You make the assertion that you should have played a niche sport and I assume you mean that's because you think you'd dominate. I'm here to tell you that I doubt it.
SteelBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 09:46 PM   #13
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,363
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Swimming is like track and field olympics in 1912. It's wide-open.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 10:13 PM   #14
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
Swimming is like track and field olympics in 1912. It's wide-open.
Okay, Mr. Lingo.

Swimming in a narrow field won't mean much but on a national level it does. Competing against spots against the Aussies and Chinese if formidable.

The conditioning required coupled with enough talented athletes is also significant. Would it be better if more minorities participated? Probably. It's mostly driven middle income families in warm weather states, Cali, SoCal and NoCal, Texas, Florida and a little bit from everywhere else. Though during the days of Spitz, Indiana University excelled due to its world class coach. You may have excelled within your city but the size of today's sprinters also included athletes. Most of the guys go 6'2" and beyond and female swimmers are also comparatively long.

Distance is about lots of work. People who don't swim underestimate the quality of the top notch swimmers.

The main difference is the lack of depth below national level.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.