|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Art house films with real sex but not classified as porn? | |||
| Immoral; porn by another name |
   
|
6 | 66.67% |
| Morally neutral |
  
|
1 | 11.11% |
| This is art; I don't believe in judging art as moral or not. |
  
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Not relevant to me; I don't see anything over PG-13 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-18-2008, 10:04 PM
|
#1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
 |
Art house films with real sex but not classified as porn?
Films (usually made overseas) are becoming more prevalent that have real sex but are not considered porn because they don't show insertion and have plots and character development. Is this immoral? (Confidential poll.)
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
|
|
07-18-2008, 10:11 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
I am fine with graphic (sex) in movies as long as the graphic (sex) is realistic to the time period.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2008, 10:15 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2008, 10:18 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 945
 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
