04-19-2008, 04:59 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
What this makes me feel above all else
is a huge disappointment and loss of confidence in human nature.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...my-ranch_N.htm Hand in hand with the granting of civil liberties must go personal accountability and beyond that personal responsibility, on a mass scale. Our system rests more than anything on civic virtue. The law can't possibly police and enforce the code of conduct required of the vast majority of citizens for our system to work. America is a collosal implicit bargain and act of faith. That's why our system doesn't work in places like Russia. I don't like raids on cults and mass strippings of parental rights. The abstract notion offends me as a civil libertarian. On the other hand, I'm not sure the orthodox LDS here are worthy of our stystem of trust. They're living on the wrong continent and the wrong millenium. I hate what has happened to them, but I hate them for making a farce out of our system of personal responsiblity. The whole thing breaks down when people choose to live so attrociously in an entire community.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
04-19-2008, 05:49 AM | #2 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
You do realize that they are not LDS, but FLDS. They named themselves. They didn't get booted by the Mormons.
Also, though it's not quite spelled the same, the irony of the name of the courthouse is rather delicious.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
04-19-2008, 10:31 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
Quote:
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
|
04-19-2008, 02:57 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaysville, UT
Posts: 3,151
|
I'm sure the phrase "orthodox lds" was chosen very carefully by our friend SU. That wasn't transparent at all was it? LOL.
__________________
Still fat ... |
04-19-2008, 04:14 PM | #5 | |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Quote:
It won't work SU. We love you anyway and we'll always keep the first pew open for you and your family.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
|
04-20-2008, 03:51 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
04-20-2008, 04:32 AM | #7 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
It has nothing to do with religion, just screwed up people.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
04-20-2008, 04:55 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
The evidence conclusively shows (does it not) that it was simply secular scrutiny--a desire to avoid the dire legal consequences of continued practice of polygamy and increasing pariah status due to the priesthood ban--that forced your LDS Church from a very similar course as the FLDS and closer to the mainstream.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
04-20-2008, 08:24 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Just out of curiosity, how exactly to you "check" religion? What standard do you use? How do you define "civic virtue"? Does secularism actually prescribe any sort of moral standard to evaluate a religion and its practices?
|
04-20-2008, 09:04 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_virtue With Christianity's long association with our culture it would be narrow minded and unfair to not give Christianity a great deal of credit for our civic virtue. I think the primary beneficial effect has been sort of indirect, however, a trickle down and ferment, if you will. Christianity is in the stew, though Christianity itself is heavily endebted to earlier metaphysics, including Greek philosophy and Judaism, as we've discussed here. How to "check" religion? See the First Amendment. Secularism is part and parcel of our contemporary civic virtue. There are no formal standards, but our contemporary civic virtue implicitly or explicitly condemns certain traits traditionally endemic to religion such as ethnic hatred if not racism, sexism, superstition, anti-intellectualism, and hostility to science. It is no longer the case that religion is the primary if not sole source of our civic virtue or ethos. Rather, our predominantly secular ethos curbs or checks religion. Thank God.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|