cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2008, 07:55 PM   #1
8ballrollin
Senior Member
 
8ballrollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,287
8ballrollin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Shock the Monkey



Quote:
The sharp spikes in oil prices associated with the 1973-74 oil embargo, the 1978 Iranian Revolution, the Iran-Iraq War in 1980, and the first Persian Gulf War in 1990 were each followed by an economic recession. However, when oil prices started to rise again five years ago, many of us suggested that things would be different this time, in part because the price was rising much more gradually and so should be less disruptive of consumer spending patterns. Others emphasized that, despite the price increases, oil was still cheaper than it had been historically if you took into account inflation. However, once you include the most recent data, neither of those claims would still be true.
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/...l_shock_o.html
__________________
"Five to one...
One in five
No one here gets out alive"
8ballrollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:41 PM   #2
scottie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 525
scottie is on a distinguished road
Default

Thankfully we've got our best man on it:

scottie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 01:07 AM   #3
jay santos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
jay santos is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8ballrollin View Post

This partially explains why the oil majors are not acting in a way that would increase supply dramatically. They are very conservative and still deciding capital projects based on a much lower oil price. They're not approving projects that would make profit on $70 a barrel because they don't expect this to endure long term and don't want to get left holding the bag. They're approving projects that make profit at $45 a barrel and grinding things out, not making dramatic shifts in production. Not to mention other factors, such as length of time for these projects, limited opportunities, etc.
jay santos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.