cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2007, 08:20 PM   #51
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
I don't really have an opionion on the film or whether BY ordered the hit. I was interested to see that you suggested it didn't matter to you whether he did.

I'm not a "liberal."
You have to be careful when you say something doesn't matter to you. In this day of political correctness, if you say "it doesn't matter" you can get charged with all sorts of things. A biggot, homo-phobe, insensitive, and on and on.

What I was suggesting was it doesn't matter when it comes to my salvation. That act doesn't change whether he was a prophet or not. If he did order it, the consequences will be between he and God. I am not in a position to judge what those consequences should be. If he ordered it, with my limited understanding of things, I would declare, shame on him. However, I wouldn't then say I renounce my membership in the church.

I might actually come closer to leaving the fold over the blue and white shirt thing.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 08:21 PM   #52
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
I'm not a "liberal."
Oh really? What are you then? A "progressive", like Hillary says?
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 08:23 PM   #53
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
Oh really? What are you then? A "progressive", like Hillary says?
He's an unimaginative contrarian troll.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 08:31 PM   #54
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

SU is getting an unfair rap here (and those are words I never really expected to say). Tex's comment, as I have said, was probabyl not uttered with rascist intent, especially in the context of Indy's ealrlier post abotu border control and improved legal immigration. Nonetheless, SU is correct that this sort of comment is frequently used to mask rascist sentiment in the immigration debates and SEIQ points out that this has long been the case. I am nto sure what you are all arguing about. Can anyone deny that many opponents of immigration are rascist? Doesnt' it seem most likely that Tex was relaly trying to say what he clarified as being his point?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 08:42 PM   #55
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ View Post
Nobody with any sense wants more murderers in this country. If that was your point, it seems like it could have been forgone.

Which is why racist discourse seems to be lurking around that post. What you wrote invokes the old, "well, there are the good, clean-cut articulate ones and then there are the bad ones," rhetoric that gets deployed against most any minority (including against whites when they are in the minority) by bigots who want to soft-pedal their prejudices.

Anti-immigration rhetoric and racism have gone hand in hand for a long time. Historically, nobody in the U.S. talked about immigrant quotas when it was pasty Western and Northern Europeans coming over (except those "hard scrabble" Irish Catholics, of course). "When the sweet Norwegian couple moved in across the street it was just wonderful. But those Vietnamese? They better stay in their own neighborhood." People started talking about quotas and about slowing the "tide" of immigration when it was all of those "other" kinds of people. We don't want too many of "them," it was said.

No doubt, Tex, you weren't considering this context when you posted. I'm sure you'll clarify all of this toot sweet.
Honestly, all I meant to say is that I want law-abiding, productive immigrants in, and law-breaking, unproductive immigrants kept out.

That y'all have warped it into an entirely irrelevant conversion on racism underscores the bizarre hypersensitivity this board has with the subject.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 10:03 PM   #56
Detroitdad
Resident Jackass
 
Detroitdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
Detroitdad is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Throw out the racism charge on Tex and bring on the xenophobia charges.

I don't think Tex is a racist nor do I think he intended this as racist, but I do think his source was intended to push the fear that is at the heart of xenophobia.
Detroitdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 10:22 PM   #57
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroitdad View Post
Throw out the racism charge on Tex and bring on the xenophobia charges.

I don't think Tex is a racist nor do I think he intended this as racist, but I do think his source was intended to push the fear that is at the heart of xenophobia.
xenophobia and racism are close siblings. I'm not sure I called Tex a racist in this thread. But clearly his comment echoed an infamous and oft-repeated racist phrase.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 10:53 PM   #58
All-American
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,420
All-American is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to All-American
Default

So, let me try to sum up what I've learned here. To want secure borders is racist; the alternative, however, is to not care about murder. No wonder nobody can win in this argument.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος
All-American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2007, 10:58 PM   #59
Sleeping in EQ
Senior Member
 
Sleeping in EQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
Sleeping in EQ is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American View Post
So, let me try to sum up what I've learned here. To want secure borders is racist; the alternative, however, is to not care about murder. No wonder nobody can win in this argument.
I am definitely not arguing that to want to secure borders is racist. Although racism, and as DD points out, xenophobia, have long been leveraged in the name of such, there are other ways of arguing for a secure border.
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV)

We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
Sleeping in EQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.