10-13-2008, 03:47 PM | #1 |
Master
|
Why Human Polls Suck
http://pollspeak.com/pollstalker/pol...=&v=35&w=8&r=V
This guy is all over the place. 8 of the teams in his polls he has placed at the extreme end in comparison to his fellow voters.
__________________
Ernie Johnson: "Auburn is a pretty good school. To graduate from there I suppose you really need to work hard and put forth maximum effort." Charles Barkley: "20 pts and 10 rebounds will get you through also!" |
10-13-2008, 03:50 PM | #2 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
which team, among those ranked by every AP voter, has the highest variance in ranking?
(I don't know the answer, I'm hoping someone will answer for me). |
10-13-2008, 03:52 PM | #3 |
Master
|
I don't know but at that site I am sure you can figure it out because they show the variance.
__________________
Ernie Johnson: "Auburn is a pretty good school. To graduate from there I suppose you really need to work hard and put forth maximum effort." Charles Barkley: "20 pts and 10 rebounds will get you through also!" |
10-13-2008, 03:54 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Computer ratings are better:
http://d1afootball.com/d1apoll.htm The problem with humans is they can't possibly watch every game and they have short memories, so they're left with highlights, reputations, personal bias, etc. Computers get rid of these problems but are left without the human variable of actually seeing a team play. I actually think an average of the two, something akin to the BCS formula, is pretty ideal for ranking teams (for seeding purposes in a playoff...). |
Bookmarks |
|
|