cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Literae Humaniores

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2007, 06:42 PM   #1
Black Diamond Bay
Senior Member
 
Black Diamond Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,000
Black Diamond Bay is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Black Diamond Bay
Default The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico

Has anyone else here ever read the Discover & Conquest of Mexico, written by Bernal Diaz?

I know he wrote it a good 30 years after the incidents in question, and that there are some occasional inaccuracies in his timeline (which appear to all be documented in the footnotes). However, I also remember one of my professors telling us that many people deem it to be largely inaccurate. After reading about half of it, I'm not sure how anyone who wasn't actually there could possibly know how accurate/inaccurate the book is. Anyone have any insight on this?
Black Diamond Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 06:43 PM   #2
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Good question, but certainly not my area of expertise.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 07:17 PM   #3
Black Diamond Bay
Senior Member
 
Black Diamond Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,000
Black Diamond Bay is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Black Diamond Bay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Good question, but certainly not my area of expertise.
...and apparently no one else knows what I'm talking about either. For those of you that like history let me just recommend doing some reading about the sun kingdoms of the Americas. It's absolutely fascinating, although a little on the creepy side at times. Very interesting, I think particularly from a Mormon perspective (and no SU, I'm not claiming that it proves the BofM is true.)
Black Diamond Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 08:49 PM   #4
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Wow. I looked this book up on Amazon. It looks facinating. It sounds like something creekster may have read. As far as its accuracy, there are some concepts to keep in mind.

First, because the writer lived not long after the events in question, indeed while many eyewitnesses still lived, his account shouldn't be dismissed as largely inaccurate. Herodotus was not an eyewitness to the momentous events described in his "Histories," but historians accept them as providing generally the best available record of what happened and as such the narrative is accepted as history with caveats including that some facts are contrary to logic or common sense.

Second, some assertions can be tested with logic. For example, Herodotus says 700,000 or some such huge number of Persians under Xerxes' command invaded the Greek Isles. But we know that logistically it would have been impossible for an army of anything close to this size to migrate vast distances as a cohesive unit, that transporting enough food and other provisions would be impossible, and that the Greek countryside could not have supported such a vast army. I understand scholars have pegged the number at closer to 30,000 to 80,000 Persians.

Third, archeological discoveries test the accuracy of an account. For example, we know that the ancient, highly civilized Greek society described by Thucydides really existed because of the massive ruins, and, indeed, Roman civilizaion itself and to a large extent ours is built on this culture. There has even been loose corroboration of the Iliad, a story that is clearly fanciful in many if not most respects, from archeological digs evincing Minoan cities destroyed by seige warfare during the time in question including a particularly large one on Asia Minor believed to be Troy (far from conclusive).

Fourth, truth for truth's sake was not assigned the same value as it is in our society. Telling a good story or prapaganda may have been more the objective. Often we see that a story is uncannily derivative of a myth or chronicle from an earlier epoch.

Fifth, linguistics play a critical and perhaps the most conclusive role in testing accuracy of ancient chronicles and histories. Jared Diamond discusses, for example, how traces of dialect in South Seas languages establishes indigenus people from the isles came from the south of China in pre-history.

This is a totally lay perspective, and I undoubtedly missed some considerations.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster

Last edited by SeattleUte; 06-12-2007 at 08:53 PM.
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 09:29 PM   #5
Black Diamond Bay
Senior Member
 
Black Diamond Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,000
Black Diamond Bay is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Black Diamond Bay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
Wow. I looked this book up on Amazon. It looks facinating. It sounds like something creekster may have read. As far as its accuracy, there are some concepts to keep in mind.

First, because the writer lived not long after the events in question, indeed while many eyewitnesses still lived, his account shouldn't be dismissed as largely inaccurate. Herodotus was not an eyewitness to the momentous events described in his "Histories," but historians accept them as providing generally the best available record of what happened and as such the narrative is accepted as history with caveats including that some facts are contrary to logic or common sense.

Second, some assertions can be tested with logic. For example, Herodotus says 700,000 or some such huge number of Persians under Xerxes' command invaded the Greek Isles. But we know that logistically it would have been impossible for an army of anything close to this size to migrate vast distances as a cohesive unit, that transporting enough food and other provisions would be impossible, and that the Greek countryside could not have supported such a vast army. I understand scholars have pegged the number at closer to 30,000 to 80,000 Persians.

Third, archeological discoveries test the accuracy of an account. For example, we know that the ancient, highly civilized Greek society described by Thucydides really existed because of the massive ruins, and, indeed, Roman civilizaion itself and to a large extent ours is built on this culture. There has even been loose corroboration of the Iliad, a story that is clearly fanciful in many if not most respects, from archeological digs evincing Minoan cities destroyed by seige warfare during the time in question including a particularly large one on Asia Minor believed to be Troy (far from conclusive).

Fourth, truth for truth's sake was not assigned the same value as it is in our society. Telling a good story or prapaganda may have been more the objective. Often we see that a story is uncannily derivative of a myth or chronicle from an earlier epoch.

Fifth, linguistics play a critical and perhaps the most conclusive role in testing accuracy of ancient chronicles and histories. Jared Diamond discusses, for example, how traces of dialect in South Seas languages establishes indigenus people from the isles came from the south of China in pre-history.

This is a totally lay perspective, and I undoubtedly missed some considerations.
It is fascinating.
Some of what he has written is clearly backed up by archeological finds. There are other things he talks about that are really interesting that aren't the sort of things that archeology can confirm or dispute.

When I'm done with this I'm going to read the Popol Vuh, which I hear is also very interesting. Although someone did tell me once that it was a bit like reading the BofM on LSD.
Black Diamond Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 10:22 PM   #6
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I am reading a fascinating historical fiction based the research of the author of the pre and post Columbian Aztec empire.

It is simply called Aztec, by Gary Jennings who passed away in 1999. Great historical information which he researched and revealed through the form of a story.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 06-24-2007 at 10:59 PM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 11:15 PM   #7
il Padrino Ute
Board Pinhead
 
il Padrino Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
il Padrino Ute is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The USA conquered Mexico today in Chicago as it defended the Gold Cup.

USA! USA! USA!
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver

"This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB.
il Padrino Ute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:16 AM   #8
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Okay Aztec ritulistic killings leave a little to be desired:

"the priest suddenly lowered the arrow and jabbed it with all his strenght upward, twisting it, int the lbue man's genital organs. The victim, however, much he might have thought he desired that release from life, gave a scream. He howled a scream, he ululated a scream that overrode the sound of flutes, drum and changting. He screamed, but he did not scream for long.

The priest, with the bloody arrow, drew a corss on the man's chest for a target, and all the prieensts pranced about him in a circle, each carrying a bow and many arrows. As each passed in front of the xochimiqui, he trummed an arrow into the man's heaving breast. When the pra ncing was done and the arrows used up, the dead man looked like an overgown specimen of the animal we call the prickly little boar."

Okay, the Aztecs were brutal cruel.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:19 AM   #9
BarbaraGordon
Senior Member
 
BarbaraGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
BarbaraGordon is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

Okay, the Aztecs were brutal cruel.
I thought there was still question as to whether this kind of stuff ever happened? Largely invention/exaggeration to justify the mission/conquest?
BarbaraGordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:24 AM   #10
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
I thought there was still question as to whether this kind of stuff ever happened? Largely invention/exaggeration to justify the mission/conquest?
The Mayans will tell you that when you visit Chichinitza, but there is plenty of evidence that it did happen. The question is with what frequency.

The Mayan guides inform you, it was only old and mortally-ill "volunteers". Perhaps, but ancient societies viewed volunteers differently than do I.

Here's some stuff.

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=000...3E2.0.CO%3B2-D

http://cdis.missouri.edu/previews/2065/lesson01.htm
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 06-25-2007 at 02:28 AM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.