cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Current Events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2008, 05:36 PM   #21
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon View Post
Not me. No way. Crappy overpriced cars. They got what was coming to them, due to (among other things) their complete and utter failure to prepare for rising gasoline costs, relying almost wholly on SUV sales to stay afloat.

I much prefer the part of Romney's proposal that emphasizes transitioning Detroit in to the capital of America's energy sector. That seems much more viable to me.
I agree with you and Romney. But, if the big 3 are gone, who will lead the transition into renewable energy?
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 05:42 PM   #22
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venkman View Post
Maybe I'm a hypocrite, because I opposed the wall street bailout but support some sort of auto bailout. I see a difference in that wall street caused the mess and now we're bailing them out? Plus, regardless of how many banks go out of business, we're in no danger of losing our insurance, banking, financial services industries. However, we are losing our manufacturing base and we may lose our auto industry. Huge difference IMO.

However, your point is taken. I generally believe in free markets, but it's not my overriding ideology above all else. What I AM for is an strong independent America full of a free prosperous people. I believe manufacturing and the auto industry are cruicial to maintain our prosperity and freedoms and we're losing it gradually.

Here's where I break with the traditional conservative / Wall Street Journal view. They view America is a market, not a country. Losing your auto industry? Losing your manufacturing? No big deal. Our government has hamstrung industry through high taxes and regulation. Our industry is competing against foreign competition with much lower costs and with governments that support their industries. Yet when our auto industy falters, it's all their fault. Government tax, labor, and trade policy has nothing to do with it. Right.

Yes, I reject the cradle to grave welfare state and the many redistributionist policies. But I do believe that our government has the obligation to give it's industries a level playing field in the global marketplace, and they've done NOTHING in that regard. Should we go the protectionist route? I'm not sure. But protectionism dominated our trade policy until the mid-20th century and it grew this country into the greatest economic power in the world. "Free Trade" has resulted in the loss of our manufacturing base and a loss of real wages in the last 30-40 years. I'm simply no longer willing to buy all of Adam Smith hook line and sinker.

How bout a little economic patriotism? Let's give our auto brethren a little help out of the hole. One we all dug.
You've got your facts and theory mixed up. Protectionism didn't make US an economic power. And you ignore that the US has become a pharmaceuticals and IT powerhouse under free trade.

Real wages haven't gone down under free trade, they've increased dramatically. Real median wages have remained stagnant, but that's due mostly to technological change and CEO pay, not to trade. Europe has made the same expansion of trade and their median wages are growing at a much faster clip.

Free trade is a no-brainer for all economists. ALL economists. Conservative, liberal, it doesn't matter.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:38 AM   #23
Venkman
Senior Member
 
Venkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
Venkman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
You've got your facts and theory mixed up. Protectionism didn't make US an economic power. And you ignore that the US has become a pharmaceuticals and IT powerhouse under free trade.

Real wages haven't gone down under free trade, they've increased dramatically. Real median wages have remained stagnant, but that's due mostly to technological change and CEO pay, not to trade. Europe has made the same expansion of trade and their median wages are growing at a much faster clip.

Free trade is a no-brainer for all economists. ALL economists. Conservative, liberal, it doesn't matter.
I figured you'd jump all over that.
__________________
WWPD?
Venkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 04:53 AM   #24
HighHorse
Junior Member
 
HighHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 37
HighHorse is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TripletDaddy View Post
It is interesting to read the shift on both boards.

A month or two ago, maybe more, lots of people clamoring to simply "let the market work it out."

Now that it is evident that this thing is a cluster-f of epic proportions,

Gasp. socialism!
I deserve a bailout for my business. I'll even buy a private jet, fly it to Washington, then hop in an electric car and drive it to the Capital if they will give me my bailout.

A couple of hundred million would tickle me pink. I'm not greedy like those fascist bastards in Detroit.

P.S. I need an advance to buy the jet and electric car.
__________________
"Whatever it is that the government does, sensible Americans would prefer that the government does it to somebody else. This is the idea behind foreign policy."
P. J. O'Rourke
HighHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 10:58 AM   #25
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I love the talking heads that are saying bailing out individuals on their homes and mortgages won't create a moral hazard, and won't reward people that are irresponsible, lazy, and corrupt.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.