cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Literae Humaniores

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2008, 04:17 PM   #11
K-dog
Senior Member
 
K-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 699
K-dog is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solon View Post
I liked Atlas Shrugged but it should have been about 4,000,000 pages shorter. We the Living was better (because it was shorter, IMO). If you read Atlas Shrugged, don't bother with The Fountainhead; they're 82% the same story. I'm not passionate about Rand but I don't regret having read her novels.

Rand's philosophy "Objectivism" is clearly a product of the Soviet revolution in the early 20th century, and has some serious holes, IMO. But, it's an interesting historiographical source for seeing one intellectual response to communism. In the end, Rand's extremism is as tiring to me as communism's. Same bird, different ends of the spectrum (and yes, I mixed that metaphor on purpose).
I generally like Rand but I have serious issues with her extrapolations of her philosophy. It is one thing to say that someone should not be forced to contribute to the well being of another. It is another to say that it is wrong to voluntarily contribute to others well being. Also, she is too atheist for me to really embrace.
__________________
He's down by the creek, walkin' on water.

K-dog

P.S. Grrrrrrrrr
K-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 05:13 PM   #12
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-dog View Post
I generally like Rand but I have serious issues with her extrapolations of her philosophy. It is one thing to say that someone should not be forced to contribute to the well being of another. It is another to say that it is wrong to voluntarily contribute to others well being. Also, she is too atheist for me to really embrace.
Can we agree that overtly didactic literature invariably sucks whatever the viewpoint? I read a comment about Dostoevsky in a recent book review of Coetzee's latest book (comparing Coetzee favorably to Dostoevsky) that I liked. Doestoevky, whose novels, like Rand's, contain long monologues and philosophical discussions and digressions, mastered the technique of never allowing the reader to know for sure the author's own actual beliefs. (Adam does the same thing with his posts, which is one reason I like him.)

Doestoevsky's chapters in the Brothers Karamazov, Pro and Contra, and The Grand Inquisitor, represent perhaps the most powerful philosophical argument ever against Christianity and organized religion. Even more, we feel Ivan the atheist's agony in delivering the argument. For generations Christians have wept in empathy, and we know from Doestoevsky's biography that he was in fact a Christian. It seems Rand (though I've never read her as I have Dostoevsky) clubs you over the head with her one-sided personal perspective. Not good literature or storytelling.

The wild and violent sex scenes sound intriguing, however.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 05:25 PM   #13
Mormon Red Death
Senior Member
 
Mormon Red Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
Mormon Red Death is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
Can we agree that overtly didactic literature invariably sucks whatever the viewpoint? I read a comment about Dostoevsky in a recent book review of Coetzee's latest book (comparing Coetzee favorably to Dostoevsky) that I liked. Doestoevky, whose novels, like Rand's, contain long monologues and philosophical discussions and digressions, mastered the technique of never allowing the reader to know for sure the author's own actual beliefs. (Adam does the same thing with his posts, which is one reason I like him.)

Doestoevsky's chapters in the Brothers Karamazov, Pro and Contra, and The Grand Inquisitor, represent perhaps the most powerful philosophical argument ever against Christianity and organized religion. Even more, we feel Ivan the atheist's agony in delivering the argument. For generations Christians have wept in empathy, and we know from Doestoevsky's biography that he was in fact a Christian. It seems Rand (though I've never read her as I have Dostoevsky) clubs you over the head with her one-sided personal perspective. Not good literature or storytelling.

The wild and violent sex scenes sound intriguing, however.
Just read it and tell us what you think. Its a unique story that is really good literature. There is a reason it was voted in the top books by readers in the modern library and random house critics voted it 92 (in the twentieth century) I suspect that you will like it and respect it for being good literature.
__________________
Its all about the suit
Mormon Red Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 06:38 PM   #14
K-dog
Senior Member
 
K-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 699
K-dog is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
Can we agree that overtly didactic literature invariably sucks whatever the viewpoint? I read a comment about Dostoevsky in a recent book review of Coetzee's latest book (comparing Coetzee favorably to Dostoevsky) that I liked. Doestoevky, whose novels, like Rand's, contain long monologues and philosophical discussions and digressions, mastered the technique of never allowing the reader to know for sure the author's own actual beliefs. (Adam does the same thing with his posts, which is one reason I like him.)

Doestoevsky's chapters in the Brothers Karamazov, Pro and Contra, and The Grand Inquisitor, represent perhaps the most powerful philosophical argument ever against Christianity and organized religion. Even more, we feel Ivan the atheist's agony in delivering the argument. For generations Christians have wept in empathy, and we know from Doestoevsky's biography that he was in fact a Christian. It seems Rand (though I've never read her as I have Dostoevsky) clubs you over the head with her one-sided personal perspective. Not good literature or storytelling.

The wild and violent sex scenes sound intriguing, however.
She does tend to beat you to death with her viewpoint and therefore is weaker in her presentation of her viewpoint. I agree that the Brothers Karamazov is an excellent piece of literature and makes the arguments against Christianity very well. I've never thought to contrast them.

In short, I like much of Rand's philosophy but was also frustrated by her delivery and extremism. She is also quite the anti-feminist in the classic sense, hating womanly things and believing that a woman must be manly to be successful.

By the way, Ayn's delivery is very reminiscent of yours. I'm surprised you don't like it.
__________________
He's down by the creek, walkin' on water.

K-dog

P.S. Grrrrrrrrr
K-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 09:02 PM   #15
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-dog View Post
By the way, Ayn's delivery is very reminiscent of yours. I'm surprised you don't like it.
My fiction is more Dostoevsky than Rand.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 04:34 PM   #16
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte View Post
My fiction is more Dostoevsky than Rand.
I don't mind Rand's fiction, but I find her philosophy lightweight.

Here is a good summary why to reject her "objectivism."

http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/rand.htm
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2008, 12:14 AM   #17
malapert
Junior Member
 
malapert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Pole
Posts: 148
malapert is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
I don't mind Rand's fiction, but I find her philosophy lightweight.

Here is a good summary why to reject her "objectivism."

http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/rand.htm
An interesting and helpful piece, but the black (metal) background and the yellow lettering were challenging to the eyes.
__________________
.



"He has all the virtues I dislike--and none of the vices I admire." -Winston Churchill

"He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends." -Oscar Wilde

"In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily." -Charles, Count Talleyrand
malapert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 02:52 AM   #18
Colly Wolly
Senior Member
 
Colly Wolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,281
Colly Wolly is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I'm about halfway through the Fountainhead, and it has finally really pulled me in. It took a while for Rand to set the stage, lay out all the players and their motives, but now the story is really gripping me. Howard Roark is awesome.
Colly Wolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 01:17 AM   #19
Colly Wolly
Senior Member
 
Colly Wolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,281
Colly Wolly is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

So I just finished The Fountainhead. Pretty powerful book, I feel like it's reinforced alot of my core values by making me think about them a bit differently. Great book. Loved Howard Roark's courtroom speech at the end.

Now on to Atlas Shrugged!
Colly Wolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2008, 02:52 AM   #20
Colly Wolly
Senior Member
 
Colly Wolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,281
Colly Wolly is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I took me six months, but I finally finished Atlas Shrugged. I got sucked into a kind-of last minute opportunity to enroll in a part-time MBA program, so my alot of my free time in the spring and summer was spent prepping my application. Things have been busy with work and school, but I got it done.

I liked the Fountainhead a bit better. It "moved" me more. Atlas Shrugged was good, and I'm glad I read it, but I won't read it again. The ending was a bit anti-climactic.

I picked up a copy of The Brothers Karamazov at Barnes and Noble tonight for $9.99. It'll be slow going, but I'm looking forward to it.
Colly Wolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.