09-10-2008, 08:49 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
|
Two non BCS teams in BCS games..
Posted by ESPN.com's Graham Watson
Although the season is only two weeks old, it's never too early to look at the provisions for multiple non-BCS teams to make a play for a BCS bowl. Currently, there are four undefeated non-BCS teams -- East Carolina, BYU, Utah, and Fresno State -- that are ranked nationally in the Top 25. If one of those teams remains in the top 12 nationally, it earns an automatic berth. But if two teams are ranked in the top 12 or in the top 16 and above a BCS conference champion (looking at you Big East and ACC) then things get a little dicey. According to BCS rules, no more than one team from a non-BCS conference can earn an automatic bid. If there is a second -- or third -- non-BCS team that meets the BCS requirements, then that team(s) will be placed into the pool of at-large teams with the other BCS schools. Basically, that non-BCS school would either be last year's Kansas or last year's Missouri. So, it is possible for two non-BCS teams to make BCS bowls, but highly unlikely. Besides, I'm fairly certain the number of ranked non-BCS teams will drop to three by the end of the weekend (yes, I'm being vague, wait for my picks).
__________________
Its all about the suit |
09-10-2008, 08:57 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Happy Valley, PA
Posts: 1,866
|
Quote:
What do you think? Is she predicting Wisconsin over Fresno State? Tulane over ECU? USU over Utah? Or UCLA over the BYU?
__________________
I hope for nothing. I fear nothing. I am free. - Epitaph of Nikos Kazantzakis (1883-1957) Last edited by Solon; 09-11-2008 at 07:34 PM. Reason: I guess Graham is a good name for a girl too. Sorry, Ms. Watson |
|
09-10-2008, 10:12 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,384
|
|
09-10-2008, 10:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
|
Were I objective, I probably would pick UCLA over BYU too.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
09-11-2008, 12:33 AM | #5 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
That would be a safe upset. It is a game that greatly concerns me, given UCLA's recent past success against us.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
09-11-2008, 06:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
I'd pick Wisconsin over Fresno. Too many unanswered questions about UCLA for that to be the "safe" pick.
__________________
"My days of not respecting you are certainly coming to a middle." -Malcolm Reynolds "It doesn't mean that if we lose a game or when we lose a game people won't then jump on and say the quest is over. Because they will. But they've missed the point." -Bronco Mendenhall on "The Quest" |
09-11-2008, 06:44 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cougartown, USA
Posts: 336
|
She's picking Wisconsin over Fresno, as she thinks BYU will beat UCLA and Fresno will later lose to them.
__________________
"Enter to Learn, Go Fourth and Eighteen!" :twisted: |
09-11-2008, 07:15 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere in Utah
Posts: 434
|
Last edited by Hot Lunch; 09-11-2008 at 07:17 PM. |
09-11-2008, 07:21 PM | #9 |
Active LDS Ute Fan
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nantucket : )
Posts: 2,566
|
I wonder if a win over Wisconsin is enough to vault Fresno over the BYU and ECU...regardless of whether or not both win.
|
09-11-2008, 07:29 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere in Utah
Posts: 434
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|