07-18-2006, 05:09 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,964
|
Quote:
__________________
...You've been under attack for days, there's a soldier down, he's wounded, gangrene's setting in, 'Who's used all the penicillin?' 'Oh, Mark Paxson sir, he's got knob rot off of some tart.'" - Gareth Keenan |
|
07-18-2006, 06:30 AM | #22 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
I hear what you're saying, but in fairness to my devout friends, fusnik's game is to play both sides of the fence, the objective being to tease, even arouse and bait. What I see them saying is that fusnik doesn't bear the indicia of someone who genuinely believes in Mormonism. Related to that, they say that he isn't treating what they see as sacred things with sufficient seriousness and respect, baiting as he is. I can't really argue with any of that. Personally, if fusnik really doesn't believe in it, I think he'd be happier just being genuine about it. Then he could be forthright in his critique and no one could attack him for his beliefs, so long as he didn't disrespect others'. But playing both sides of the fence you open yourself up to this kind of criticism.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
07-18-2006, 01:12 PM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
__________________
On the other hand, you have different fingers. -- Steven Wright |
|
07-18-2006, 02:22 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2006, 03:11 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
One day I showed up to church with my testimony and I noticed a new picture of the SLC temple had been framed and hung on the wall. I looked at the image and then looked down at the same image printed on my rubber sheet. Only I couldn't match one to the other for how different they now looked. I still had a testimony, but it was a testimony in a church of my own making. This wasn't really a problem, except I always felt like a stranger in my own church. Whenever I wanted to discuss anything I thought my ideas would always be shut down and shut up. Ironically, what you see in Fusnik is probably his attempt to SAVE his testimony, and not the process of losing it. I have known plenty of people that have salvaged a passing testimony through this process. I have known others who would look at the rubber sheet and look at the picture on the wall and say, "I don't belong here." Both paths can be filled with their own sorts of happiness and trials. Also ironically, I thought that places like CG were supposed to be safe places to talk about our faith, where ever it might be. But many in this thread are starting to sound like the voices from my elders Q.'s past -- shut him up and shut him down. What it comes down to is this -- do you trust Fusnik? His POV is either genuine, or he is a troll. What are the consequences of treating him like a troll when his beliefs and doubts are genuine? What are the consequences of treating his beliefs and doubts as sincere when he might in fact be a troll? If the latter, we are taken for fools, but no harm is done. But if Fusnik is sincere (and I believe he is) then the consequences of treating him like a troll will be to alienate him even more from a community where he felt that he could be open and free to talk about the current status of his testimony. And that does its own kind of damage. Treat the man with respect. Not all of our testimonies are going to be so 'mature.' At the end of the day, a lot of those smart kids at Yale were able to salvage a testimony, and live a happy life in the church. |
|
07-18-2006, 03:32 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,506
|
Glad the cougarboard bastards show their colors, loved the comments, 'offended you go the the temple,' 'hope the lady knows what she is getting into,' 'grow some guts like SU and NS,' fortunately for me, I really enjoy your internet company, so I let the comments slide off my back, no offense, spare me the apologies.
As for my testimony, if anyone cares here goes.... I firmly believe in the restoration, I believe the temples are places where pagan signs, pagan tokens, and 'apostate' keywords are given to demonstrate to us who we truly are now, and what the Lord wants us to be. How's that? I believe priesthood and it's power is as simple as genuine love and charity. Is it that far fetched to believe that priesthood, or the power to act in God's behalf is as simple as treating people with genuine love and charity? Isn't that the true manifestation of God's love? True and unabrided charity? I believe that every church serves as a prepatory period for further light and knowledge. How can any rational, or spiritual man/woman, honestly believe that a loving God who has ruled for eternities and will rule for eternities will allow this blink in time known as life, serve as the judgement point for our eternal destinations? Cannot all life experience, regardless of creed, serve as a preparing ground for continued progression? The temple, IMO, makes hypocrites of us all. Unfortunately we don't see it, we don't see that we maintain with us certain rites that are damning our spiritual souls. Do I see it? Not even close, but I strive, I labor, and I try my best. The temple was for a long time, the only reason I went to church and stayed active. It's one of the main reasons I stay active today, and it will be a reason why I always stay active. Hopefully one day, I graduate from temple class, and can strip off of me the 'natural skins' of this probation and become one with God and Jesus. Hopefully I didn't offend too many. Last edited by fusnik11; 07-18-2006 at 03:49 PM. |
07-18-2006, 03:32 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
as for piling on??? Not at all... read seattle utes post (best seattle post ever too) |
|
07-18-2006, 03:37 PM | #28 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
I have a friend who has left the church. If you ask him about the real nitty gritty spiritual stuff--the Holy Ghost stuff--he says, "I don't have an answer for that." IOTW, he does not deny his experience, and hasn't reconciled those experiences with his current path. Versus my brother who says "I made all that stuff up, it came from within. There was no heavenly source." I don't think my brother is lying. He believes what he is saying. But at some level it must nag at him. I had a conversation with Robin a long time ago, where we argued over the basis of belief. I was a proponent of the heart, that is, of spiritual feelings. He was a proponent of the mind, of rationality, of "clear thought." I believed we had fundamentally different ways of approaching belief in the church. I believed then and I believe now, if your foundation does not rest upon the Holy Ghost, your house will be washed away. I know Robin will have a response to this, that I have mischaracterized his beliefs, and that the Holy Spirit has led him in a different direction, etc. At the end of the day, you either walk away or you don't. You either cross the line in the sand or you don't. There are men that I would go to battle with. Men that I truly respect. They weren't perfect. But a common thread is that they were men of faith. |
|
07-18-2006, 03:38 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
07-18-2006, 03:43 PM | #30 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|