Raising children and daycare

[non sequitur]

Originally Posted by Burning Bright

Yes, what a radical concept; People should take care of their own children. It seems pretty simple to me. There's no flaw in my logic.

You're not real. Real people aren't that stupid. Lingo is at the very bottom of the stupid scale. When people say things that more stupid than something Lingo would say, you can only surmise that those people are fictitious. Nice try though.

[SeattleUte]

Originally Posted by jay santos

Not to mention tried to big-time us with his household income. *cough* *cough* *puke*

tooblue and jay santos = burning bright but not kidding around. They have no room to talk about pulling a sense of superiority.

[SoonerCoug]

Originally Posted by Burning Bright

Nope. I've got nothing against polygamy when the Lord commands it. (I do have something against child molesters and welfare frauds).

Is it OK to marry 14 year old girls?

[Burning Bright]

Originally Posted by SoonerCoug

Is it OK to marry 14 year old girls?

In 2007, I would say definately not OK.

In an agraian society from 150 years ago, I would say I'm not sure. Maybe. Maybe not. Depends on the circumstances?? I dunno.

[SeattleUte]

Burning Bright, I bet you haven't been laid in at least a year. I bet deep inside your wife hates you.

[Indy Coug]

Originally Posted by SeattleUte

Burning Bright, I bet you haven't been laid in at least a year. I bet deep inside your wife hates you.

Projecting?

[Burning Bright]

Originally Posted by non sequitur

You're not real. Real people aren't that stupid. Lingo is at the very bottom of the stupid scale. When people say things that more stupid than something Lingo would say, you can only surmise that those people are fictitious. Nice try though.

It is not stupid to say people should raise their own kids. What's stupid is having kids and farming them out to hired servants to raise them for you. If you don't want to take care of your own kids, you shouldn't have had them. You should have gotten a goldfish instead.

[non sequitur]

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

TIGER, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And water'd heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?

Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

This is further evidence that Burning Bright is not legit. First of all, the BB persona is not smart enough to make allusions to Blake, and if he were he would know that the Tiger symbolizes evil and would not take a moniker that symbolizes evil. I think BB is Mike.

[Indy Coug]

Originally Posted by Burning Bright

It is not stupid to say people should raise their own kids. What's stupid is having kids and farming them out to hired servants to raise them for you. If you don't want to take care of your own kids, you shouldn't have had them. You should have gotten a goldfish instead.

Except your goldfish can't take care of you when you're wearing Depends and mistaking your children for your pet goldfish.

[SeattleUte]

Burning Bright, if you work for an engineering firm of any account at all, I wonder if you have the courage of your convictions to publicize your opinion of full-time women professionals to your colleages, especially female colleagues? I bet not.