cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Professional Sports
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2006, 09:21 AM   #1
myboynoah
Senior Member
 
myboynoah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Memphis freakin' Tennessee!!!!!
Posts: 4,530
myboynoah is an unknown quantity at this point
Default What was Bonds thinking?

From the March 13 SI article on Barry Bonds' steroid use:

"Bonds' physical changes during this time were consistent with steroid use. His hair fell out . . . . Bonds' back broke out in acne . . . . Bonds also suffered sexual dysfunction . . . ."

I don't know about you all, but those look like three pretty significant entries on the negative side of the balance sheet.
__________________
Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!

Religion rises inevitably from our apprehension of our own death. To give meaning to meaninglessness is the endless quest of all religion. When death becomes the center of our consciousness, then religion authentically begins. Of all religions that I know, the one that most vehemently and persuasively defies and denies the reality of death is the original Mormonism of the Prophet, Seer and Revelator, Joseph Smith.
myboynoah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 03:35 PM   #2
All-American
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,420
All-American is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to All-American
Default

Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος
All-American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 04:10 PM   #3
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American
Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
EIther that, or he was thinking "$20 million a year? Not bad."
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 01:08 AM   #4
Fish
Junior Member
 
Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 68
Fish is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American
Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
Either way, nearly everyone was doing steroids at the time. Why single him out because he rose above everyone else. Silly waste of time. Go Bonds.
Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 01:15 AM   #5
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American
Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
Either way, nearly everyone was doing steroids at the time. Why single him out because he rose above everyone else. Silly waste of time. Go Bonds.
They are singling him out because 1) he is a prick and 2) he is close to beating the most important record in the books, and 3) he is a prick.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 04:09 AM   #6
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American
Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
Either way, nearly everyone was doing steroids at the time. Why single him out because he rose above everyone else. Silly waste of time. Go Bonds.
They are singling him out because 1) he is a prick and 2) he is close to beating the most important record in the books, and 3) he is a prick.
Right. And before the drugs he was a 32 hr/yr. guy. My heart goes out to Griffey. As a skinny kid in his mid-twenties he was hitting 50+ homers a year and doing wonders in center field. Everyone was saying he was the greatest in the game, far eclipsing Bonds, who was older. Then Griffey got hurt over and over again, and Bonds started doping. Life aint fair. Maybe it is. Maybe Bonds is just starting to get his karma that he made for himself.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 04:29 AM   #7
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleUte
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-American
Here is what Bonds was thinking:

"71."

Next?
Either way, nearly everyone was doing steroids at the time. Why single him out because he rose above everyone else. Silly waste of time. Go Bonds.
They are singling him out because 1) he is a prick and 2) he is close to beating the most important record in the books, and 3) he is a prick.
Right. And before the drugs he was a 32 hr/yr. guy. My heart goes out to Griffey. As a skinny kid in his mid-twenties he was hitting 50+ homers a year and doing wonders in center field. Everyone was saying he was the greatest in the game, far eclipsing Bonds, who was older. Then Griffey got hurt over and over again, and Bonds started doping. Life aint fair. Maybe it is. Maybe Bonds is just starting to get his karma that he made for himself.
Your heart goes out to him? To Griffey? My heart doen't go out to any of thoise guys. They're pampered rich kids most of whom have been spolied since they were young. The get paid MILLIONS to play a stinking game. Bonds is a jerk and Griffey would have done better but for his injuries, but my heart doesnt go out to any of these guys any more than it would go out to Pierce Brosnan for not getting to play Bond, James Bond, any earlier than he did. Interesting, but no big deal either way.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.