cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Religion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2007, 09:58 PM   #1
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
I don't really care about your lack of theological heartburn. What I am interested in is how in the world you arrived at this belief. Oh yeah, and are you an active member of the LDS church?

Of course your last sentence is the exact question Brian preempted by his comment about heartburn that you dismissed. I guess you do care.

Here is the question: how can you not believe in evolution? What rational evidence do you have that it isn't the mechanism at work in our world? Yes, I am an active memebr, in case you are worried.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:03 PM   #2
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,308
Brian has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
I don't really care about your lack of theological heartburn. What I am interested in is how in the world you arrived at this belief. Oh yeah, and are you an active member of the LDS church?
Yes, very. In fact I gave a talk in sacrament meeting a couple of weeks back.
We had FHE last night.

Does gravity disturb you? We understand the basics pretty well and are trying to flesh out the rest of the theory, but it's pretty evident what is going on, whether there is a graviton or something else yet to be discovered. But the fact remains, masses attract each other.
I don't see how one could view things otherwise. But, we're all free to decide for ourselves.
__________________
e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
5 great numbers in one little equation.
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:12 PM   #3
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
Yes, very. In fact I gave a talk in sacrament meeting a couple of weeks back.
We had FHE last night.

Does gravity disturb you? We understand the basics pretty well and are trying to flesh out the rest of the theory, but it's pretty evident what is going on, whether there is a graviton or something else yet to be discovered. But the fact remains, masses attract each other.
I don't see how one could view things otherwise. But, we're all free to decide for ourselves.
Nice try, but I don't see what gravity has to do with man evolving from microscopic creatures. Gravity is a fact, the evolution of man from a microscopic creature is not. In fact, there is nothing I have ever heard or read about in the scriptures, or teachings from Church leaders that gives any credence to this belief in evolution whatsoever. If you have something to suggest otherwise, I'd love to hear about it.

I believe man was created in God's image, not that man evolved into God's image.
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:14 PM   #4
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
Nice try, but I don't see what gravity has to do with man evolving from microscopic creatures. Gravity is a fact, the evolution of man from a microscopic creature is not. In fact, there is nothing I have ever heard or read about in the scriptures, or teachings from Church leaders that gives any credence to this belief in evolution whatsoever. If you have something to suggest otherwise, I'd love to hear about it.

I believe man was created in God's image, not that man evolved into God's image.
So how did God create man? What was the actual and literal mechanism He used? Apart from your belief, what evidence is there to support your suggested mechanism (assuming you have one)?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:23 PM   #5
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster View Post
So how did God create man? What was the actual and literal mechanism He used? Apart from your belief, what evidence is there to support your suggested mechanism (assuming you have one)?
I suppose the Priesthood had something to do with it. Beyond that, I couldn't tell you. Why don't you ask Him?

At least I can support my belief with the scriptures, the teachings in the temple, and Church leaders. What can the evolutionists use to support their belief?
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:26 PM   #6
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,308
Brian has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
I suppose the Priesthood had something to do with it. Beyond that, I couldn't tell you. Why don't you ask Him?

At least I can support my belief with the scriptures, the teachings in the temple, and Church leaders. What can the evolutionists use to support their belief?
If you want to be completely literal, if we were all created in the image of god, we would all look the same, same eye color, same hair color, same hair waviness, same height, weight, proportions, etc etc.

Where do you draw the literalness line?
__________________
e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
5 great numbers in one little equation.
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:35 PM   #7
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
If you want to be completely literal, if we were all created in the image of god, we would all look the same, same eye color, same hair color, same hair waviness, same height, weight, proportions, etc etc.

Where do you draw the literalness line?
I certainly draw the line at microscopic creatures! Come on...image, as in the same likeness. Being of the same image doesn't mean we all have to look exactly the same. Cut the crap.
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:39 PM   #8
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,308
Brian has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
I certainly draw the line at microscopic creatures! Come on...image, as in the same likeness. Being of the same image doesn't mean we all have to look exactly the same. Cut the crap.
I'm not BS-ing you. You seem to want to take a very literal interpretation. I think determining how literal you willing to go is a very important question.
Why do you pick the microscopic creature line?

Of course "image" isn't mirror image. I raised it just to make a point.
But I think the deeper meaning of "in the image" is a very interesting question.
__________________
e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
5 great numbers in one little equation.
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:45 PM   #9
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
I'm not BS-ing you. You seem to want to take a very literal interpretation. I think determining how literal you willing to go is a very important question.
Why do you pick the microscopic creature line?

Of course "image" isn't mirror image. I raised it just to make a point.
But I think the deeper meaning of "in the image" is a very interesting question.
You said you believe in macro evolution. Which I believe at the most macro level would be man evolving from microscopic creatures. Would it not? If you believe man evolved from chimps, or perhaps a fish, please tell me.
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 10:47 PM   #10
SoCalCoug
Senior Member
 
SoCalCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,059
SoCalCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Cat View Post
You said you believe in macro evolution. Which I believe at the most macro level would be man evolving from microscopic creatures. Would it not? If you believe man evolved from chimps, or perhaps a fish, please tell me.
Do we know the actual mechanism by which God created humans?
__________________
Get your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty Yewt!

"Now perhaps as I spanked myself screaming out "Kozlowski, say it like you mean it bitch!" might have been out of line, but such was the mood." - Goatnapper

"If you want to fatten a pig up to make the pig MORE delicious, you can feed it almost anything. Seriously. The pig is like the car on Back to the Future. You put in garbage, and out comes something magical!" - Cali Coug
SoCalCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.