God bless Sarah Palin!

[BarbaraGordon]

See, now I don't get this. How come over-sexed is "highly sexually active," but undersexed is not a failure to get any action? I'm going to write these people. They need to update their definition.

(I've convinced Merriam-Webster to adjust a definition before. On second thought I prolly shouldn't brag about that.)

and Solon, you're really asking for it calling Archaea into this thread.

[Solon]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

See, now I don't get this. How come over-sexed is "highly sexually active," but undersexed is not a failure to get any action? I'm going to write these people. They need to update their definition.

(I've convinced Merriam-Webster to adjust a definition before. On second thought I prolly shouldn't brag about that.)

and Solon, you're really asking for it calling Archaea into this thread.

I would have connected the word to you, but I'm not the type to sexually harass. Plus, the last quotation is too funny to let go. I figure Archaea is a good sport.

[YOhio]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

I clearly didn't know what the word means.

hahahahaha! lol!

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by Solon

I would have connected the word to you, but I'm not the type to sexually harass. Plus, the last quotation is too funny to let go. I figure Archaea is a good sport.

There is no such thing as being over-sexed. Everybody else is simply under-sexed.

Archaean Lexicon, (First Edition 1984 Soporific Press, Chimera).

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by YOhio

hahahahaha! lol!

Well, what do you expect? I think it goes without saying that by either definition, I have little experience with the concept.

:-P

[YOhio]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

:-P

Whoa there. I don't want you talking about colons or pee during a discussion of "undersexed" and what you do or don't have experience with.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by YOhio

Whoa there. I don't want you talking about colons or pee during a discussion of "undersexed" and what you do or don't have experience with.

Think about it seriously.

How could one be over-sexed? One could have too many encounters with the wrong person or people, but too much happiness? That's like having too many friends, or too much money, or being too healthy.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by YOhio

Whoa there. I don't want you talking about colons or pee during a discussion of "undersexed."

Well, you know, you gotta think outside the box to keep things interesting.

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

See, now I don't get this. How come over-sexed is "highly sexually active," but undersexed is not a failure to get any action? I'm going to write these people. They need to update their definition.

(I've convinced Merriam-Webster to adjust a definition before. On second thought I prolly shouldn't brag about that.)

and Solon, you're really asking for it calling Archaea into this thread.

The definition has notihng to do with activity. It has to do with desire. You even went so far as to put "highly sexually active" in quotes. What were you quoting?

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

The definition has notihng to do with activity. It has to do with desire. You even went so far as to put "highly sexually active" in quotes. What were you quoting?

Solon's quote from the dictionary in post #39. I couldn't box quote it because it was already a quote, unless I wanted to exert effort, which I didn't.