cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Religion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 05:35 PM   #11
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
I think they should institute a new term. Dropped from the records. Excommunication sounds harsh and like the person did something evil.

If they join another church and actively preach for that religion, why not just drop them from the records. It acknowledges they are no longer a member, but not because of any evil thing they did.
Name removal is not the same as excommunication.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:36 PM   #12
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ute4ever View Post
Why should the church take the first step?

"Hey I noticed that you joined another faith. Can we do anything to help permanently sever our ties?"
Because the bishop has a responsibility for everyone on the ward's records. Home teachers have a responsibility for this person.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:38 PM   #13
ERCougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
ERCougar is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RC Vikings View Post
I'm not sure what that would accomplish. I thought being ex'ed was used as a tool to start someone toward repentance. It would seem like a total waste of time in this case.
I think this idea of exing someone to start the path of repentance has been the style in the past, but it seems to be decreasingly the case--disfellowshipping seems to be used for this, while excommunicating seems to be reserved for those who are actively fighting or bringing shame to the church. IOW, we excommunicate those who don't seem to have any interest in coming back. I think this is completely appropriate.
ERCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:56 PM   #14
ute4ever
I must not tell lies
 
ute4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
ute4ever is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy Coug View Post
Because the bishop has a responsibility for everyone on the ward's records. Home teachers have a responsibility for this person.
Perhaps President Monson should retract last month's general conference address where he asked those who have wandered to return. Being a gospel of inclusion and all.

----------

St. Peter: Please give an accounting of your stewardship as a bishop.

Bishop: My numbers were higher than average, because I closed the book on those who stopped attending.

St. Peter: Well done. Enter, your ten virgins are waiting.
ute4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:12 PM   #15
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ute4ever View Post
Perhaps President Monson should retract last month's general conference address where he asked those who have wandered to return. Being a gospel of inclusion and all.

----------

St. Peter: Please give an accounting of your stewardship as a bishop.

Bishop: My numbers were higher than average, because I closed the book on those who stopped attending.

St. Peter: Well done. Enter, your ten virgins are waiting.
These two concepts are not necessarily at odds with each other. If someone formally belongs to another faith, I don't see a problem with simply asking them if they would like their names removed from the records of the church. No coercion or persuasion is required.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:21 PM   #16
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

what does "name removed" but still being a member mean?

Thanks in advance.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:21 PM   #17
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
71's suggestion for a new status of "name removed" without excommunication would be a great option. Of course the church will never go for it--not punitive enough.
http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...3&postcount=11
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:24 PM   #18
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
71's suggestion for a new status of "name removed" without excommunication would be a great option. Of course the church will never go for it--not punitive enough.
Nonsense. People quietly have their names removed from the rolls of the church all the time. Just happened last month. The person decided of their own volition that the church wasn't for them and they simply wanted out. The request was processed.

No church disciplinary action was taken. Only 5 people know it even happened.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:24 PM   #19
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy Coug View Post
Nonsense. People quietly have their names removed from the rolls of the church all the time. Just happened last month. The person was up to all sorts of stuff and they decided of their own volition that the church wasn't for them and they simply wanted out. The request was processed.

No church disciplinary action was taken. Only 5 people know it even happened.
And everybody reading this site.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:25 PM   #20
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
And everybody reading this site.
No name was given. Good luck figuring out who it was.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.