08-10-2007, 03:01 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
|
Perry, likewise was passed over last time. Nelson or Oaks.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
08-10-2007, 03:26 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:27 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:27 PM | #14 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:30 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:33 PM | #16 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:35 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
|
08-10-2007, 03:39 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
I'm curious where this sense comes from that the next member of the First Presidency needs to be the next most senior member in the quorum?
|
08-10-2007, 03:43 PM | #19 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
|
08-10-2007, 04:17 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
|
Since he ate at my house during Stake Conference weekend one time when I was a Deacon, I have to go with L. Tom Perry.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
Bookmarks |
|
|