05-26-2007, 06:02 AM | #11 | |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
Quote:
Torture is torture, not matter what it is. I really don't see varying degrees.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
|
05-26-2007, 01:52 PM | #12 | |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
Quote:
|
|
05-26-2007, 05:10 PM | #13 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Please provide evidence documenting the regular and sanctioned use of urination or electrical current attached to nipples by US troops or interrogators. Hint: you won't find any. Quote:
Yeah, you're right, those are roughly equivalent. By the way ... lest we lose perspective: as best we know, waterboarding was practiced on only a select few. Only the hardest, most vicious, most senior terrorists were subjected to it. That's not an argument for its moral rightness or wrongness, but it dispenses with the myth that every "innocent" terrorist that walked in the door was subjected to it.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young Last edited by Tex; 05-26-2007 at 05:14 PM. |
||||
05-26-2007, 06:15 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Mr. Tex,
I'm not certain the rest of us have time to go round in circles with you regarding what the rest of the educated, first world nations (and all major human rights agencies) regard as torture policies unacceptable for the supposed leader of the free world. So I have a suggestion: You fly down to Gitmo and check it out for us. And I don't mean just a long weekend. Stay for a good few weeks so you have time to explore the really nasty sections they don't like visitors to see. Make sure you see the police dogs in action and get a chance to chat with the psychiatrists hired to ensure the practices are as miserable and fear-inducing as possible. If you can swing it, watch as someone is force-administered an enema, then chained to the floor naked to lie in his own shit for days. When you finish up there, head over to the black sites, where non-agents of the U.S. government employ techniques outlawed at Gitmo. There are several options, but you might consider Uzbekistan, where if you're really lucky you might just see someone boiled to death. Of course these might just be exaggerations by the vast left-wing conspiracy, which is why we need you to check everything out first-hand. Make sure to update us on your findings and don't forget to send me a postcard! Thx!! ~babs. Sources Consulted: * Lewis, Neil. Guantanamo tour focuses on medical ethics. New York Times November 13 2005. * Lewis, Neil. Red Cross finds detainee abuse in Guantanamo. New York Times November 30 2005. * Mayer, Jane. The experiment. New Yorker July 11 2005. * Program on International Policy Attitudes. Global views on US. January 2007. (See question M2 part d.) Available online: http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pi...n07_quaire.pdf * Toobin, Jeffrey. Inside the wire. New Yorker February 9 2004. * Van Natta, Jr, Don. U.S. recruits a rough ally to be a jailer. New York Times May 1 2005. Last edited by BarbaraGordon; 05-27-2007 at 05:14 AM. Reason: added sources |
05-26-2007, 08:52 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Thank you for your polite response. You are making a combination appeal to authority and appeal to popularity. The opinions of many (nameless) first world nations and (nameless) major human rights agencies are irrelevant. Even were I to accept this premise, I would argue there is no nation or agency in the world that carries enough moral high ground to dictate to America what she should or should not do in the interests of her own defense. And please don't cite Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International. They are both clearly anti-American establishments. I believe the Red Cross--a respectable organization--has met with nearly all of the "high-profile" detainees and many of the lesser ones. I'm not aware of any significant criticism. The rest of this is equally irrelevant. The assumption is that if I just watched the interrogation techniques I would change my mind and agree with you and the "rest of the world." I could be irrelevant in turn, and suggest you turn one of your family members over to al-Qaeda for "a good few weeks" and see if you feel such strong objections to the terrorists' treatment thereafter, but I won't. Troglodyte that I am, you'll simply have to be more convincing than condescending if you want to be persuasive. One wonders if the truly tortuous acts of America take place in the "nasty sections they don't like visitors to see," how is it that you know so much about them? I never claimed these techniques were pleasant. (Again, "child's play" is an idiom ... a metaphorical expression.) They are of course unpleasant, because these are unpleasant people hell bent on committing unpleasant acts. There are ways to extract the information we need from them without losing our humanity. Where to draw the line is where you and I disagree. In the end, torture is a matter of opinion. As someone else observed, it's like obscenity: an "I know it when I see it" issue, and as such, we debate it. I have my opinion and you have yours, and we talk about it like the civilized folk that we are. If you don't have time to "go round in circles" with me, may I gently suggest you opt not to respond--nay, even read--my posts any longer. Regards, Mr. Tex
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
05-26-2007, 09:00 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
|
05-26-2007, 09:02 PM | #17 |
Resident Jackass
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
|
Tex-
Would you be comfortable with our troops undergoing waterboarding, sleep deprivation and the rest? If not, why? If so, why? I am not asking whether you believe that those and worse would be used on our troops (as I am sure they would). Just whether you think that those interrogation techniques would be legitimate if used by our enemies against us. |
05-27-2007, 12:20 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
According to the New York Times of 11/30/2004, page 1A, the ICRC has in fact determined that the abuses at Guantanamo qualify as torture.
|
05-27-2007, 04:17 AM | #19 | |
Formerly Mastershake
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 707
|
this is one of the funniest posts of all time
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2007, 05:20 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
|
Anybody ever see the Mythbusters episode on the Chinese water torture? They strapped the girl (Kari, I believe) into the chair and did the experiment on her. She was told that at any time, she could ask to be let go and they would immediately comply. They kept the water temperature reasonable, and basically did everything they could to make it as pleasant and comfortable an experience as possible, with the exception of the water drops. She freaked out. They tried it on one of the guys in a lazy boy with no restraints whatsoever, and he only lasted a few minutes. Painful? Absolutely not. Torture? Absolutely.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
Bookmarks |
|
|