interesting article about the holy grail of doping:

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by creekster

That's nto what I meant. I mean that to suggest that Rasmussen is probabyl dirty beacsue of his beahvior but to ignore the facts surrounding LA which also lead one to the the same sort of conlcuions is dishonest. Rasmussen and Armstrong have exactly the same number of positive drug tests, after all. To be fair, however, LA was always exemplary in appearing for drug tests, including OOC tests, but the point remains. I don't think we shoud spend time investigating the past to try to hang LA (Landis is on-going and was caught in competiton and so is a different matter) but to ignreo the circumstances when one examines the past, historically, is ostrich-like. .

I can agree with this.

There is the distinction of Lance always being available for testing.