Kill the wild horses to give ranchers more grass

[MikeWaters]

I'm glad Levin is here. I was getting tired of carrying all the water.

[Levin]

The fact is, public lands have to be managed . . . Ranchers would agree with that. But the ranchers don't own those lands, and so they can't do with them what they want. Americans get a say.

[Goatnapper'96]

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

GN throws a pity party for himself every few weeks.

I'm glad the CB crowd doesn't see it. They might lose respect.

Keep it up tuff guy, now landpoke is smarter than you as well!

[Goatnapper'96]

Originally Posted by Levin

Now you're sounding more reasonable. Where public land management affects private landowners, then accomodations need to be made.

But your accomodations -- kill 40% of the wolf population on public landsin one year, and allow private citizens to kill wolves indiscriminately, whether on public or private land if they "worry" livestock or domestics is not the proper accomodation. But it's typical . . .

It seems to me that the biologists have set the numbers with respect to the gray wolves. Once that number is reached the gray wolves find some effective paco rabanne aphrodisiac all winter and wax female gray wolf ass like they are friggin porn stars and the end result is that a 40% thinning is neccesary two or three years later to get the number back to agreed upon benchmark, why are you envirowankers pulling string?

[Levin]

Originally Posted by Goatnapper'96

It seems to me that the biologists have set the numbers with respect to the gray wolves. Once that number is reached the gray wolves find some effective paco rabanne aphrodisiac all winter and wax female gray wolf ass like they are friggin porn stars and the end result is that a 40% thinning is neccesary two or three years later to get the number back to agreed upon benchmark, why are you envirowankers pulling string?

Why do you want to keep the gray wolf endangered on the brink of extinction?

[MikeWaters]

Originally Posted by Goatnapper'96

It seems to me that the biologists have set the numbers with respect to the gray wolves. Once that number is reached the gray wolves find some effective paco rabanne aphrodisiac all winter and wax female gray wolf ass like they are friggin porn stars and the end result is that a 40% thinning is neccesary two or three years later to get the number back to agreed upon benchmark, why are you envirowankers pulling string?

There is no "agreed upon benchmark" ya moron. Getting the wolves back to endangered status is the goal of the ranchers, not the goal of the American people.

[Levin]

Originally Posted by Archaea

Hmm, Atlantic City versus Vegas.

I told you your attitude will result in the West looking like New Jersey.

[Archaea]

Originally Posted by Levin

The fact is, public lands have to be managed . . . Ranchers would agree with that. But the ranchers don't own those lands, and so they can't do with them what they want. Americans get a say.

Other than saying, "it's our land," you haven't given any persuasive argument. Those directly affected should have primary input.

And unless it is worthy of a national park, it should be sold off and privatized. I'm against public ownership of lands which are not used for parks or for the national defense. Aside from that, it should be sold off to the public.

[Goatnapper'96]

Originally Posted by Levin

The fact is, public lands have to be managed . . . Ranchers would agree with that. But the ranchers don't own those lands, and so they can't do with them what they want. Americans get a say.

If what is done on public lands spills onto impacting private lands, the private landowners should have more say than some faggit hippie in Portland or Greenwich Village. However, a heterosexual hippie is allowed more say than the faggit hippie..even gray wolves don't like stool pushers.

[Venkman]

Originally Posted by Levin

The fact is, public lands have to be managed . . . Ranchers would agree with that. But the ranchers don't own those lands, and so they can't do with them what they want. Americans get a say.

Question is, should the feds own 50-80% of western states land? I say no. All BLM land should be ceded to the individual states.