03-31-2007, 07:02 AM | #1 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Pyramid at Cheops
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
03-31-2007, 07:10 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
This sems to me to make so much sense that it is hard for me to believe that it has not been considered previously. Looking at the images makes it seem very likely. DO any of you science types out there have nay thoughts as to why this wouldn't be possible?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
03-31-2007, 01:37 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Happy Valley, PA
Posts: 1,866
|
Quote:
I thought the ramp idea had been accepted for quite a while. I guess this guy is "proving" the details?
__________________
I hope for nothing. I fear nothing. I am free. - Epitaph of Nikos Kazantzakis (1883-1957) |
|
03-31-2007, 04:06 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
My understanding is that this guy is saying the ramp was part of the structure. IOW, prior theories involved ramps or the equivalent of scaffolding that was not part oif the structure itself, but this guy is showing that it could have been the structure itself that was the mechanism for the raising of the building. It is rather ingenious as he has proposed it. I am no expert, but within my limited experience, other theories did not include a ramp which was incorporated into the building.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
03-31-2007, 06:43 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Happy Valley, PA
Posts: 1,866
|
Quote:
I always heard it must have been a temporary ramp made of dirt (sand) and brick with some type of lumber to reinforce it. This new theory seems better.
__________________
I hope for nothing. I fear nothing. I am free. - Epitaph of Nikos Kazantzakis (1883-1957) |
|
04-02-2007, 01:01 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
I have been thinking about this a lot this weekend (yes, I realizer this is bizarre). I find it amazing that this has never been considered before. As described in the articles, previous theories were based in one of two approaches: either a straight ramp on one side of the pyramid, which would have been almost a mile long as the pyramid neared completion and which would have been almost as time consuming to build as the pyramid itself, or a ramp built around the outside of the structure that was removed when the pyramid was complete. The latter option would have made finish work difficult and would also have required significant labor and materials. There is apparently little direct evidence of either one of these options. So after centuries of thinking about it someone strikes on an idea that is simple and yet so obvious. These sots of gestalts are hard to explain. Where do they come from?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
04-02-2007, 03:48 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
04-02-2007, 03:56 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
I was just trying to confirm my place on thr non-intellectual list so Rocky will like me more. Yes, I meant epiphany.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
Bookmarks |
|
|