cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Art/Movies/Media/Music/Books
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008, 04:03 AM   #1
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Brain Function/Insurance/Freud

I wanted to get Waters' take on this. I've just finished

http://www.amazon.com/Making-Good-Br...9508735&sr=1-1

He said that through SPECT scans, it's discovered that the brain matures at 25. Car insurance companies discovered this with data before the theoretical link was established.

He also chews out psychiatrists for not adopting brain imaging at a fast-enough pace, making it lag behind the rest of medicine. It's like orthepedics not taking X-rays.

He said that Freud wanted to examine the brain, but the technology of his day wouldn't let him. He knew that one day neuroscience and psychology would be together. But now, even with advances, the idea is slow to be adopted.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 04:24 AM   #2
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
I wanted to get Waters' take on this. I've just finished

http://www.amazon.com/Making-Good-Br...9508735&sr=1-1

He said that through SPECT scans, it's discovered that the brain matures at 25. Car insurance companies discovered this with data before the theoretical link was established.

He also chews out psychiatrists for not adopting brain imaging at a fast-enough pace, making it lag behind the rest of medicine. It's like orthepedics not taking X-rays.

He said that Freud wanted to examine the brain, but the technology of his day wouldn't let him. He knew that one day neuroscience and psychology would be together. But now, even with advances, the idea is slow to be adopted.
I don't agree with this conclusion for a couple of reasons:

1) it is very expensive.
2) it is not accurate enough

Meaning, that you can't use a scan to make a diagnosis, because there is too much variation.

What would it mean if I took a $1000 scan and said, "there's a 65% chance, based on this scan, that you are depressed." And he says back to me, "Not sh*t Sherlock, that's why I came to you in the first place."

They day may one day come that we use scans to make diagnoses, monitor treatments, etc. But it's pretty far away.

The real problem is we don't understand etiology, pathophysiology, and prevention. That's the problem in psychiatry.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.