Romney going hardline on sex ed

[Sleeping in EQ]

Originally Posted by tooblue

I did read the article, and I'm seriously trying to understand your comment? I understand that Romney's quote was clumsy (out of context) and that Obama jumped all over with sanctimonious zeal.

Maybe you should sit this one out, TB. I have no guile here. Romney talked about science education in the context of "dirty water." This is not a question of him being taken out of context.

You're being hypersensitive.

[tooblue]

Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ

Maybe you should sit this one out, TB. I have no guile here. Romney talked about science education in the context of "dirty water." This is not a question of him being taken out of context.

You're being hypersensitive.

I'm not suggesting guile. I simply don't understand your comment and was hoping for an explination. I'm not trying to pick a fight etc.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ

Maybe you should sit this one out, TB. I have no guile here. Romney talked about science education in the context of "dirty water." This is not a question of him being taken out of context.

You're being hypersensitive.

I believe the term he used was "filthy water." And like TB, I have no idea what you're getting at. You need to explain for us troglodytes.

[Indy Coug]

Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ

It's an interesting day when someone cites science in the context of "dirty" "water."

Maybe he was talking about environmental issues (clean water) being a more important than trying to have some form of kindergarten sex-ed program.

[Sleeping in EQ]

Originally Posted by Tex

I believe the term he used was "filthy water." And like TB, I have no idea what you're getting at. You need to explain for us troglodytes.

Nope. Not biting. Your feigning ignorance, anti-intellectual martyr routine won't fly here. And you wonder why people find you disingenuous.

[hyrum]

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

Maybe he was talking about environmental issues (clean water) being a more important than trying to have some form of kindergarten sex-ed program.

Later in the article there is a mention of television and media influence on children. Perhaps that is the "filthy water" he was referring to, but its not real clear in that piece.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ

Nope. Not biting. Your feigning ignorance, anti-intellectual martyr routine won't fly here. And you wonder why people find you disingenuous.

Heh, amusing. I honestly have no idea what he's talking about, and SIEQ thinks I'm "feigning." Maybe I'll Google "filthy water" and see what it comes up with.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

Romney will say or do anything to do be elected. He is the GOP Clinton.

Speaking of which, I saw your Romney banner in one of the CB links. Very nice...

I wonder if Fred Thompson is delaying his entry as long as possible while he watches the three GOP front-runners make fools of themselves...

Regarding Romney's comment, I have no problem with children being taught to protect themselves from sexual predators.

[MikeWaters]

Thompson is even worse than Romney. He is a charlatan.

[BarbaraGordon]

Originally Posted by MikeWaters

Thompson is even worse than Romney. He is a charlatan.

I fail to see what makes Thompson an ideal candidate. But you have to admit there's wisdom in his delaying while the other guys beat themselves up.