03-11-2008, 04:24 PM | #131 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
2. I've actually read the entire thread (other than the more recent, uber-long posts rehashing the same BS as before). Granted, post #8 runs contrary to his other posts, which I believe was a typo. Check post #5, and you'll see why I think that. Arguing that SOME leniency at SOME point in the process COULD justifiably be applied is CERTAINLY no worse than Mike's suggestion that the action MIGHT have been deliberate. I see no difference between your ascribing to Tex things he never said and his ascribing to Mike things he never said. In truth, I think you're both off on this. Tex started accusing Mike of something Mike didn't say, but you're doing the same to Tex. No difference, IMO. You're both being jackasses. 3. Quite clear. And you're free to feel that way. Tex is free to feel mercy applied to this situation wouldn't be out of place. And yet you continue to demonize him for it. 14 pages of this nonsense, and you're both still at the exact same place. Good work. 4. Ditto. At any rate, I'll be stepping out of this conversation. I really had no place in it to begin with, and probably should have just kept my fingers to myself. I'm very much empathetic towards cyclists - when you've got to share the road with idiots piloting vehicles outweighing you by thousands of pounds, it's natural to feel the way you do. Especially considering the idiocy I see happening from behind the wheel of my own car. Hopefully, more than a few drivers will read this story, and therefore decide to be more considerate towards cyclists. I'll certainly try to be more careful myself. |
|
03-11-2008, 04:30 PM | #132 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
Quote:
I admitted in the thread that I went too far in post #9. You, like tex, choose to see my position as denying all possibility of compassion or mitigation. It does not. I see it present in sentencing, but not in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. You may be correct that we are both being jackasses, but I don't think I am. I appreciate your conclusions, and really that is my hope for all drivers.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
|
03-11-2008, 04:35 PM | #133 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
Why does somebody wish to let the cop off completely? The victims didn't get any reprieve.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
03-11-2008, 04:43 PM | #134 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
Knowing this, if, on driving into work this morning, I were to fall asleep and thereby kill someone, should I be prosecuted? I'd have to say yes, I would deserve to be. I doubt many people would feel it unfair if the charges were dropped, considering the circumstances. I also doubt I would be offended if, were it cyclists I killed, cyclists were publicly calling for prosecution. NOTHING excuses drowsy driving, and related accidents. There are reasonable circumstances that could have contributed to the situation. If this cop's circumstances. If that's the case, I think there's room for leniency. The appropriate leniency, obviously, will rightly vary depending on each of our personal, emotional involvement with the issues at hand. |
|
03-11-2008, 04:49 PM | #135 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
My question is, why is only one form of leniency legitimate? The leniency in sentencing seems to balance both concerns best. In reality, if it were drowsiness that caused the accident, I don't wish to seem him actually serve time in jail, but rather I'd prefer to see him convicted to show the public this is a warning, and perhaps given a suspended sentence on probation. The leniency of letting the perpetrator completely off the hook seems to rob the public need. I mean it's a nice rhetorical device Tex is employing, paraphrasing, "you guys are real hard asses wanting to throw the book at him, but I'm taking the higher road, hoping everybody will kiss and make up lovy dovey." In reality, his route only helps one side of the equation. Going on a speaking tour should be the requirement of his probation or suspended sentence.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
03-11-2008, 04:49 PM | #136 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,919
|
There was an example in our paper this morning of what I think creekster was alluding to.
Last summer, a guy (happens to be a member of the church) was driving his boat at the lake in the direction of the setting sun. Not being able to see well, he crashes into another boat, killing a young 12 year old girl. He was prosecuted by the DA and just yesterday pleaded no contest and was sentenced. Considering the circumstances of the accident and his obvious remorse in the moments and months following the accident, his sentence was community service, probation and several hundred dollars in fines (I'm not sure what that was for). Was it enough to bring peace to a heart-broken family? I'm not sure. Was his mistake enough to warrent jail or prison time? Probably not. It was a case of horrible indiscretion and carelessness on his part. But I'm glad they prosecuted and sentenced him according to the law, no unlike what we're talking about with the cyclists. |
03-11-2008, 04:50 PM | #137 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
I fully recognize your RIGHTFUL belief that this officer should be fully prosecuted, and any leniency should come as part of the sentence. That stance is reasonable to me. That is not to say someone who says leniency in this case can come earlier in the process is unreasonable. The nature of most people is to think they're not a jackass. I'm a little different than most - I fully embrace my ass-itude. BTW - nothing pisses me off more than stupidity when driving in any shape or form. Even when I'm the one being the idiot. That may actually be more infuriating, since I pride myself on my conscientious driving habits. |
|
03-11-2008, 04:55 PM | #138 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,371
|
Quote:
I just don't think Tex has been saying exactly what he's being accused of saying. That's the ONLY contribution (and a pretty poor contribution it is) I've tried to add to this thread. |
|
03-11-2008, 04:56 PM | #139 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
Of course, Tex being Tex, would not want to be like the rest of sinners on CG.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
03-11-2008, 04:58 PM | #140 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
In public offenses, a just result addresses all sides of the equation, if possible. Here it's possible. Under Tex's scenario, it's not possible.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|