01-20-2008, 12:51 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norcal
Posts: 5,821
|
Once again, the VS broadcast appeared very low budget
Did you notice how long it took them to update the scoreboard after a shot? How about how many times the score went down on the screen after a bucket (for a few seconds). Combine that with the poor sound quality (sounded like a HS game) and you've got one unimpressive broadcast.
|
01-20-2008, 04:11 AM | #2 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
But you did get to see the game.
It will take some time for VS. to get up to speed as far as being a quality broadcast. Remember how unprofessional ESPN looked in it's first couple of years?
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
01-20-2008, 05:13 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 81
|
I loved how several times they showed close ups of the crowd or players running down the court. By the time they got back to the game they missed all the play on one end of the court.
|
01-20-2008, 07:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
|
I'm with you Steel. There were so many times when the person operating the scoreboard was 1 or 2 possessions behind in updating the darn thing.
I've seen a lot of mtn. broadcasts that were much higher quality than the garbage we saw today. Also the color commentator Tim McCormick....wow that guy was just terrible.
__________________
Masquerading as Cougarguards very own genius dumbass since 05'. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|