cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-21-2005, 01:03 AM   #11
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Disagree with Chino

First, if you pick a select group of economists, you may get them to agree that income tax rates has no affect upon growth, but intellectually I can't agree.

Let's look at Scandanavia, France and Germany which have high levels of costs, including income taxes, and I argue those rates do impact growth. The reason I argue that is that growth is often stimulated when they are reduced. It's plain if more money is taken out of commerce there will be less to invest.

Clinton's "accomplishments" are not something I've seen documented, but how much was Clinton and how much was due to a Republican controlled Congress is another question.

The Fed's members are nominated by the President, thus insofar as he selects the members and the chair he impacts fiscal policy. There are other controls as well. Let's not be that simplistic.

I do agree government can stimulate some aspects of research and development, but generally disagree with Chino's other statements.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.